My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-16_REVISION - C1994082
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2008-06-16_REVISION - C1994082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:07 PM
Creation date
6/20/2008 10:16:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/16/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review/Comments
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Type & Sequence
TR37
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. Hydrologic input parameters including original approved curve numbers (Table 13-1) for <br />Ponds 010 and 011 were initially given in Tab 13 Facilities section. Attachment 13-12 was <br />subsequently prepared for the Yoast South area (Ponds 012, 013, and 014) and contained a <br />second modified curve number table. With TR-37 Attachment 13-12 was significantly <br />modified and Table 13-12.1 Yoast Mine Curve Numbers was substantially expanded. We now <br />have two lengthy curve number tables in two different sections of the permit. To avoid <br />confusion, it would be helpful to have both curve number tables be consistent with each other, <br />or refer the reader to just one location in the permit for approved curve numbers. Please update <br />the appropriate sections of the permit document accordingly. <br />7. A couple of errors were noted on Figure 13-12.3. Channel YPM-6-2A was not included in the <br />figure. Under YPM-18 the slope is given as 11-313%. Please make the necessary corrections <br />to Figure 13-12.3. <br />8. On new Exhibit 13-12.1A and revised Exhibit 20-2, Postmine Channel YPM-3-2A is missing. <br />Please include this channel on the exhibit. <br />9. The watershed boundary designations have become confusing and difficult to correlate between <br />the channel and pond designs and the exhibits that show the watershed boundaries and <br />designations. For example, it appears that the designations shown on Exhibit 13-12.1 no longer <br />correlate with the Watershed Identifications and the hydrologic input parameters for the <br />postmine channel and pond design SEDCAD runs for the Yoast South area. It is also appears <br />that Exhibit 13-413 needs to be updated with the current watershed condition as of September <br />2007 and with new Channel YPM-22. If appropriate, remove Exhibits 13-12.1 and 13-413 and <br />replace them with a single map showing the revised watershed designations. Alternatively, the <br />appropriate watershed designations could be added to the new Exhibit 13-12.1A. <br />10. Please revise Appendix 13-12.3 with an updated channel design(s) for the YPM-4, 4-1, 4-2, <br />YPM-17 and Diversion 13A system of channels that flow into Pond 013. There were no <br />previous existing designs for Diversion 13A and it appears that the existing channel <br />information to be retained for YPM-4, 4-1, and YPM-17 do not match the new Pond 013 As- <br />Built SEDCAD design information for contributing areas and peak discharges. <br />11. Since the recent slide activity at Pond 012, the configuration of the pond has obviously <br />changed. This was confirmed by the pond storage capacity survey submitted May 28, 2008 for <br />Abatement Step 1 of NOV CV -2008-001. In the new certified As-Built Report for Pond 012 <br />(Option 1) page 13-12A-1.4, SCC indicates that "Exhibit 13-6, As-Built Pond 012, presents the <br />existing impoundments configuration and structure elevations". This statement is no longer <br />correct since the slide occurred after the submittal of TR-37 and the configurations and <br />structure elevations have changed. Please remove the revised Attachment 13-12A As-Built <br />Report from the revision application since this report is no longer appropriate. As stated above <br />in Item 5, we recommend the two-pond option (012 and 012A in series) that should be <br />designed in concert with the slide remediation plan and takes into consideration a smaller <br />dimension for Pond 012. Please resubmit a new design for the two-pond system accordingly. <br />New certified As-Built Report and new As-Built Map for the two pond option (012 and 012A <br />design) will be required following construction.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.