Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 2 <br />Hernandez, Daniel <br />From: Hernandez, Daniel <br />Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 9:23 AM <br />To: Cramer, Johanna <br />Cc: Kaldenbach, Tom; Berry, David <br />Subject: RE: West Elk <br />Johanna - <br />I just heard from Dave Berry by telephone. His direction was to go AP, not AC. <br />Thanks! <br />From: Hernandez, Daniel <br />Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 8:53 AM <br />To: Berry, David <br />Cc: Kaldenbach, Tom; Cramer, Johanna <br />Subject: RE: West Elk <br />Hi, Dave - <br />Johanna and I need a bit of clarification: <br />The third sentence in the second paragraph below states, "The Division provides this conditional approval to <br />allow... ". Was it Ron's intent that we approve TR-111 with a specific condition/stipulation? Or are we supposed <br />to just approve it without a condition/stipulation, and just put the language from Ron's e-mail in the cover letter <br />and the public notice? <br />Thanks! <br />From: Berry, David <br />Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 5:40 PM <br />To: Hernandez, Daniel; Kaldenbach, Tom; Cramer, Johanna <br />Cc: Berry, David <br />Subject: FW: West Elk <br />Per Ron's message below, proceed with the TR111 proposed decision and include the language below in the <br />letters and publication. <br />David <br />From: Cattany, Ron <br />Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 5:29 PM <br />To: Berry, David <br />Subject: West Elk <br />The Division is in receipt of the June 6, 2008, letter and Appeals Decision from the GMUG National Forest giving <br />its consent to the surface use proposed by the mine plan modifications related to TR 111. <br />The Division conditionally accepts this consent as proof of right of entry, with final approval contingent upon the <br />6/18/2008