My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-05_REVISION - C1996083
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-06-05_REVISION - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:32:33 PM
Creation date
6/6/2008 9:25:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/5/2008
Doc Name
Response & Review Memo
From
Kent Gorham
To
Joe Dudash
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
KAG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 C O L O R A D O <br /> <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 D IV IS I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 M I N I N G <br /> <br /> SAFETY <br /> Bill Ritter, Jr. <br /> Governor <br /> Harris D. Sherman <br /> Interoffice Memorandum Executive Director <br /> Ronald W. Cattany <br /> <br />To: <br />Joe Dudash Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br /> <br />From: <br />Kent Gorh <br />041? <br />CC: S <br />andy Brown <br />Subject: PR-10 Response Review, Bowie No. 2, C-96-083 <br />Date: June 5, 2008 <br />I ,have reviewed Bowie Resources responses to our June 6, 2007 adequacy letter as requested in <br />your memo dated May 20, 2008. The focus of my review were questions 25, 26, 27, 31, 34, and <br />35. <br />25. Monitoring frequency will be continuous and any seismic event with a PGA of greater <br />than .05 g measured at the Terror Creek monitoring site will result in an inspection by <br />Bowie of the Bruce Park Dam and the adjacent landslide. Quarterly reports to the <br />Division will document and discuss all data recorded over the reporting period. I believe <br />this question is resolved. <br />26. Issue resolved. Report format is much improved. <br />27. Issue resolved. Permit text discussion is provided as requested by DRMS. <br />31. a) Issue resolved. <br />31. b) Issue resolved. <br />34. Has the SEO reviewed the Geotechnical Monitoring Plan for the landslide in Vol. IIIA, <br />Tab 20? If they are OK with it I am fine with this issue. <br />35. Based on meetings with Bowie and review of the revised information, I have no further <br />questions at this time. Revised engineering and monitoring plans are sufficient to allow <br />the project to proceed. <br />Let me know if you have any questions. <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.