My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-05-28_REVISION - C1981019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2008-05-28_REVISION - C1981019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:32:07 PM
Creation date
5/28/2008 1:30:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/28/2008
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
Colowyo Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR72
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
achievable levels. To the contrary, goals and subsequent efforts will be designed to "strongly <br />emphasize " and obtain greater acreages of shrub-dominated communities on a much greater portion of <br />the reclaimed landscape. If Colowyo is successful in achieving the desired goals, there will be a <br />component of "compensation" that will result. <br />With regard to the use of strip-seeding ("banded seeding approach ") on grassland areas, the <br />potential for use of this technique has been extended to 15% slopes (see response to Comment 416) at <br />the discretion of the reclamation coordinator. <br />With regard to the three bulleted items in this comment, Colowyo concurs with the third bulleted <br />item that "a standard of at least 250 live woody plants per acre will apply on at least 3% of the pre- <br />2008 reclaimed surface ". With regard to the second bulleted item, Colowyo does not concur with the <br />Division's suggestion, especially given that precedent has already been set in Northwest Colorado for <br />the proposed zero woody plants on grassland targeted areas. Although, Colowyo continues to propose <br />zero woody plants on grassland (grazingland land use) targeted areas as a success criterion, the <br />proposed seed mix contains 42% shrub seed based on the total number of seeds to be planted. This fact <br />indicates that the "goal " will be to achieve a substantial woody plant component in these areas, <br />however, there should not be a success criterion for an area that is primarily intended as grazingland. <br />With regard to the first bulleted item, it seems that the Division and/or CDOW has not fully <br />considered Colowyo 's multi faceted approach to addressing the well-established difficulty of attaining <br />elevated densities of shrubs within a short time span such as the 10 year bond responsibility period. <br />This new approach has been carefully designed to provide a scientifically defensible procedure to <br />document at the end of the bond responsibility period that shrub populations are on the path to provide <br />adequate density after additional time and recruitment events have passed if they do not already exhibit <br />adequate density to be releasable. This procedure allows for the variable densities that are often <br />obtained (and are typical of native circumstances), as well as allowance for necessary additional time <br />for populations to expand and achieve equilibrium densities (assuming they exhibit a positive <br />recruitment rate). <br />Despite the sound ecological principles and logic presented in this approach, Colowyo has <br />proffered a compromise position and now offers within the revised text of Section 4.15.8, the following <br />as a woody plant density standard for those areas achieving Sagebrush Steppe classification and <br />originating from either areas targeting shrubland or grassland. <br />"On manifested shrublands ... the following criteria will be applied depending on shrubland <br />classification. On "core areas" (areas ofshrub concentration and comprising no less than one-third <br />the total shrubland acreage), the eventual desirable goal shall be 1000 plants per acre, but the standard <br />shall be 375 live plants per acre after 10 years, or 200 live plants per acre with documentation of a <br />positive recruitment rate (within Colowyo reclaimed shrub communities). At least one-half of these <br />totals shall be sagebrush species. Similarly, in "ecotonal areas " (comprising no more than two-thirds <br />of the total acreage), the eventual desirable goal shall be 500 plants per acre, but the standard shall be <br />200 plants per acre after 10 years, or 100 plants per acre with documentation of a positive recruitment <br />rate (within Colowyo reclaimed shrub communities). " <br />The CDOW's desire to obtain greater shrub densities in lesser time, though laudatory, is <br />somewhat naive given the present state-of-the-art of revegetation. It also does not take into <br />consideration the habitats and habitat diversity that occurred in the American West prior to the <br />influence of European man. Though certain techniques have been found to occasionally work elsewhere
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.