My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-05-27_REVISION - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2008-05-27_REVISION - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:32:04 PM
Creation date
5/27/2008 10:00:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/27/2008
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Responses
From
DRMS
To
Blue Mountain Energy Inc
Type & Sequence
TR65
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. "...or buried at the Halandras Landfill", was inserted on pages IV-4 and IV-12 to clearly <br />indicate on-site disposal of concrete rubble and off-site disposal of other demolition debris. <br />The following text was inserted on page IV-4: "BME may store limited amounts of explosives <br />on site in a magazine at the designated location". Item Resolved <br />7. In the April 8, 2008 submittal, BME included revised versions of the seed mixes in Tables'V- <br />10 and V-11. Table V-10 presents seeding rates on a PLS seed per square foot basis, while <br />Table V-11 presents the same mixes on a PLS ponds per acre basis. In general, the proposed <br />modifications result in over-all seeding rate reductions and increase in the percentage of native <br />species relative to introduced species, and the proposed changes are acceptable. However, the <br />Table V-10 column subtotals for shrub seeding rates and total seeding rates are incorrect. <br />Table V-11 Total Grasses subtotals for all three columns and Total Mix totals for the Ist and P <br />columns also appear to be in error. <br />Please review the proposed mixes and correct the column subtotals and totals as <br />warranted. <br />8. For the purposes of TR-65, the Division will accept the proposed generalized field trial <br />commitment. A more detailed field trail design (location, layout, topsoil and subsoil source <br />areas and recovery methods, etc.) will need to be provided in a separate revision application to <br />be submitted following the on-site agency meeting. The benefit and practicality of earlier <br />implementation of the field trial will also be discussed at the meeting, and amended schedule <br />will need to be included in the field trail design application if warranted. Item Resolved for <br />the Purposes of TR-65 <br />9. BME amended the subject permit section to include reference to potential benefits of using <br />Plateau or similar herbicides for cheatgrass suppression and control of cheatgrass seedbank in <br />topsoil stockpiles, and also included amended narrative regarding the a possible need for the <br />use of monocultures of highly competitive wheat grasses in certain situations. <br />More specific details related to revegetation and management practices, as well as the possible <br />need for modification of success standards for areas subject to heavy cheatgrass competition <br />may be warranted, and these issues should be discussed with the relevant parties at the on-site <br />meeting. A revision addressing further amendment of the revegetation plan may be warranted <br />following the site visit/meeting with BLM and DOW. Item Resolved for the Purposes of TR- <br />65 <br />10. Item Resolved <br />11. Item Resolved <br />12. Item Resolved <br />13. Item Resolved
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.