Laserfiche WebLink
the 26 February 2008 meeting between the Division and Colowyo. During <br />the meeting and in a follow-up letter dated 12 March 2008, the Division <br />requested that Colowyo provide a more detailed description and timing of the <br />final regrading and closure of the East Pit, including a map, or plate, and <br />acreages of each regraded area, to ensure that it will conform with the <br />approved design and the SEDCAD modeling. Additionally, the Division also <br />requested that Colowyo provide a more detailed description of any alternate <br />sediment control measures that it will use in the East Pit reclamation. This <br />information will allow the Division to more accurately assess the East Pit <br />reclamation and give the Division a higher level of confidence with regards to <br />the Prospect drainage and the Prospect Pond. <br />Current modeling of the Prospect watershed includes ONLY disturbed acres, <br />which, in the worst hydrologic condition, are topsoiled and seeded. In other <br />words, modeling includes no areas of regraded spoil or topsoil that has not <br />been seeded. This is significant for the following reason. Colowyo regraded <br />86 acres in 2006 and topsoiled those same acres in 2007. They completed no <br />backfilling and grading to final grade in 2007 in the East Pit (see 2007 ARR). <br />Therefore, according to the currently approved modeling and pond design, <br />Colowyo must topsoil and seed all acres backfilled and graded in the same <br />field season. There are about 281 acres remaining in the Prospect watershed <br />to return to final grade, topsoil, and seed. <br />Furthermore, Colowyo is currently sumping runoff from reclaimed areas to <br />the pit or partial pit, as the case may be. This obviously helps prevent issues <br />at the Prospect pond and beyond but this practice also raises questions about <br />design criteria, maintenance, and impoundment questions relative to the <br />ditches and sump. If Colowyo does, in fact, plan on using this sumping <br />method to control runoff from both the disturbed and reclaimed areas of the <br />Prospect drainage, this needs to be explicitly stated and the necessary <br />hydrologic designs must be provided to the Division. If the Division does not <br />have design information for aditch/sump system that fails, there is no way to <br />ensure that the system was constructed and/or maintained to any required <br />standard or design. <br />Please provide the Division with a detailed schedule for the backfilling <br />and grading of the East Pit up to and including final pit closure. Please <br />include a map, or plate and acreages of each regraded area, to ensure <br />that it will conform to the approved design and the SEDCAD modeling. <br />As part of this schedule the Division also requested that Colowyo provide <br />a more detailed description of any alternate sediment control measures <br />that it will use in the East Pit reclamation, including surface roughening <br />techniques for the areas that have been recently topsoiled. Additionally, <br />please provide detailed information regarding the sumping and diversion <br />of Prospect runoff into the East Pit, including the hydrologic condition of <br />Colowyo C-1981-019 4 Permit Renewal 05 <br />