My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (329)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (329)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:13 PM
Creation date
5/12/2008 10:33:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/15/2008
Doc Name
VOL VII APP 13 Summary Audit Report
From
CC & V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> <br />federal effluent limitations also applies to discharges from the VLF. The Carlton <br />Tunnel discharge area was evaluated; a series of settling ponds have been <br />installed to collect carbonate precipitates from the discharged water, and <br />refinements to this system are in planning.-The Carlton Tunnel discharge has <br />been evaluated by a licensed hydrogeologist and determined to be from multiple <br />infiltration sources, only one of which is related to the CC&V operation. <br />As the VLF is operated as azero-discharge facility, in all except the most <br />extraordinary precipitation events, water will not be discharged into Arequa <br />Gulch, and there will be no mixing zone. However, if such a situation were to <br />occur, the current CDPES permits would permit a discharge of 0.020 mg/1 WAD <br />cyanide. The hydrogen peroxide destruct system would be operated at the <br />external storage pond as necessary in such an event to achieve these values prior <br />to discharge. It should also be noted that the cyanide monitoring requirement <br />has been removed from the Carlton Tunnel discharge permit on the basis of a <br />long history of nondetects and "reasonable potential analysis." A cyanide <br />monitoring requirement still remains in the Fourmile Creek spring permit <br />(located downstream from the settling ponds below the Carlton Tunnel <br />discharge; monitoring data also indicate a long history of nondetects for cyanide <br />at this sampling point, however, it is understood that CC&V has prepared the <br />data and has submitted documentation to substantiate a similar "reasonable <br />potential analysis" exemption for the Fourmile Creek permit: <br />4.6 Implement measures designed to manage seepage from cyanide <br />facilities to protect the beneficial uses of ground water. <br />The operation is: ^ in full compliance <br />^ in substantial compliance <br />^ not incompliance ...with Standard of Practice 4.6. <br />Discuss the basis for the Finding/Deficiencies Identified: <br />• <br />'The CC&V operation has installed a double synthetic liner design component at <br />the PSSAs (i.e., the in-heap solution pond system) over a layer of compacted <br />clayey soil. The liner design also includes a LVSCS between the synthetic liners, <br />Cyanide solution seepage is collected in this system, which drains to a central <br />sump/collection point prior to being continuously pumped back to the heap. <br />The LVSCS is monitored on a daily basis. A pumpback arrangement is located <br />Cresson Project <br />Name of Mine <br />-~'~~~ ~ <br />~--'' <br />Signature of Lead Auditor <br />10 September 2007 <br />Date <br />Page 18 of 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.