My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (195)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (195)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:03 PM
Creation date
5/6/2008 3:52:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/15/2008
Doc Name
VOL IV APP 7 Stability Evaluation for East Cresson & Squaw Gulch Overburden Storage Areas
From
CC & V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`1~JC <br />SMITH WILLIAMS CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />2.0 Site Conditions <br />2.1 SGOSAE Foundation <br />The site conditions within the SGOSAE were investigated as part of previous Amendments to <br />MLRB Permit M-1980-244. The results of the site investigations are presented in CC&V (1998 <br />and 2000) and Golder (1993). The data from the site investigations indicate that the SGOSAE <br />foundation is characterized as consisting of moderately dense, colluvial deposits ranging in <br />thickness from 0 to 15 feet, overlying competent bedrock. The colluvial materials generally <br />consist of gravel and sand in a silty clay matrix, classifying as GC, SC, ML, and SM under the <br />Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). In some areas, a thin (less than 6 inches) growth <br />media layer is present. <br />The SGOSAE foundation is mostly dry as the area is within the generally porous diatreme. The <br />SGOSA foundation contains numerous historic surface and underground mine workings; <br />however, the mine workings are not large enough to influence the global stability of the OSA. <br />In the location of the SGOSAE (see Figure 1), the natural foundation grades are approximately <br />15 to 28 percent. <br />2.2 ECOSA Foundation <br />The foundation of the ECOSA was investigated as part of the Phase 5 VLF extension by Smith <br />Williams and Water Management Consultants (2008). Site investigations within the ECOSA <br />area included excavation of 54 test pits and drilling 8 borings (which were completed as <br />piezometers). <br />Data from the site investigations indicate that the ECOSA foundation consists of approximately) <br />foot of growth media underlain with moderately dense clayey sands, clayey gravels, lean to fat <br />clays, and silty sands. These soils classify as GC, SC, CL, CH, and SM under the USCS. These <br />soils were underlain by fractured bedrock intercepted at depths ranging from 4 to over 20 feet. <br />No groundwater was encountered in any of the borings advanced in the ECOSA foundation. <br />There are only a few underground mine workings within the ECOSA. These workings are not <br />large enough to influence stability of the facility. <br />In the location of the ECOSA (see Figure 1), the natural foundation grades are approximately 10 <br />to 15 percent. <br />S:IPROJECTS\1125C CC&V CRESSON OSA1H2 - DESIGN\OSA STABILITY FINAL REPORT V2.DOC 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.