My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (198)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (198)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:03 PM
Creation date
5/6/2008 9:38:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/15/2008
Doc Name
VOL III Appendix 4, Review of Ground Motion Attenuation Studies Performed at CC&V & Appendix 1
From
CC & V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The combined Globe Hill and Ironclad data sets provide the most <br />conservative scaled distance relationships. This combined data set <br />} comprises all of the production blast data acquired at the mine <br />site. Vibra-Tech bases all recommendations on the Ironclad and <br />Globe Hill combined data set because of its conservative nature. <br />The attenuation rates are similar in the combined and Cresson data <br />sets and suggests similar ground motion attenuation <br />characteristics. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />Vibra-Tech recommends a scaled distance of 23.15 in order to not <br />exceed 1.0 inch per second. A scaled distance of 34.2 is required <br />to not exceed 0.50 inches per second. These are +95% confidence <br />intervals, the U.S.B.M. suggested method of scaled distance <br />determination. These scaled distance recommendations are site <br />specific and are based on the conservative production blasting data <br />set. <br />Use of a scaled distance of 34.2 for all blasting in the proposed <br />Cresson mine area will prevent any possibility of exceeding a 0.50 <br />inch per second peak vibration limit. This equates to a maximum <br />charge weight per delay period of 3420 pounds of explosive at a <br />• 2000 foot distance from any point of concern. Lower charge weights <br />per delay period will result in lower ground motions. The data <br />collected in the Cresson area suggests that the use of a scaled <br />distance of 34.2 will result in a maximum particle velocity of 0.32 <br />inches per second. <br />The use of a scaled distance of 34.2 does not impose a burden on <br />typical production blasting and will assure regulatory compliance <br />with a large margin of safety. Keeping vibrations to a maximum of <br />0.50 inches per second will minimize complaints and assure <br />compliance with the Variable Particle Velocity versus Frequency <br />Limits recommended in U. S. B. M. Report RI-8507 (Nov. 1980). The <br />peak frequency in virtually all of the records collected is 10 <br />Hertz. The use of 100 ms delays is the cause of the 10 Hertz <br />dominant frequency. Records taken at all distances greater than <br />683 feet or a scaled distance of 19.3 satisfied all Variable <br />Particle Velocity versus Frequency criteria. The highest recorded <br />particle velocity at distances beyond 2000 feet was 0.02 inches per <br />second. This is a vibration level that is beneath the level of <br />human perception. <br />This study is statistically accurate and was conducted with modern <br />i equipment and in a manner that is accepted as "state of the art". <br />It~is not a substitute for direct vibration monitoring of all <br />production blasting. The best method of limiting liability and <br />reducing complaints is to monitor all blasting at the nearest <br />I • points of concern. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.