Laserfiche WebLink
Preliminary Adequacy -ssues 2 April 25, 2008 <br />AM-03, M-1988-112 <br />Through AM-03, the Applicant proposes to discontinue the water treatment program and route <br />the West Pit water to the Salazar Ranch where it will be released, untreated, as irrigation water. <br />The irrigation activity proposed at the Salazar Ranch is located in an aquifer recharge area and <br />in close proximity and up-gradient to the water supply for the Town of San Luis. As noted by the <br />objecting parties, many of whom are residents of San Luis, the proposed cessation of water <br />treatment and release of the untreated water on the Salazar Ranch appears to increase, rather <br />than minimize, the potential for disturbance to the hydrologic balance. Pursuant to Rule 3.1.6, <br />please demonstrate how the proposed irrigation activity at Salazar Ranch will minimize <br />disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic balance as opposed to continuation of the water <br />treatment program. Pursuant to Rule 6.4.20(1)(e), please clarify how the proposed plan will <br />provide for net improvements in the protection of human health, property or the environment. <br />As noted in the attached memo from DRMS staff member David Bird, the alluvial aquifer <br />underlying the Salazar Ranch has been classified by the Colorado Water Quality Control <br />Commission (WQCC). Therefore, the Salazar Ranch is a specified area and pursuant to Rules <br />3.1.6(1)(b) and 3.1.7(1)(b), the water quality standards listed on Tables 1 through 4 of The Basic <br />Standards For Ground Water, 5 CCR 1002-41 (Regulation 41), shall apply. As such, the permit <br />condition values proposed on Table G.4-3 of AM-03 for iron at 0.3 mg/L, manganese at 0.05 <br />mg/L, sulfate at 250 mg/L, and pH at 6.5 to 8.5, are appropriate. However, the values proposed <br />for fluoride at 4 mg/L and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) at 500 mg/L exceed the standards of <br />Regulation 41 and must be revised to 2 mg/L for fluoride and 400 mg/L for TDS. As discussed <br />below, the Division recommends expansion of the list of parameters for analysis to include the <br />full suite of water quality standards listed in Tables 1 through 4 of Regulation 41. <br />The irrigation activity proposed at the Salazar Ranch appears to have potential to release <br />unauthorized pollutants to the ground water. According to section G.3 of AM-03, the untreated <br />West Pit water exceeds the water quality standards for fluoride and manganese. As noted in <br />the attached staff memo, the untreated West Pit water also exceeds the standard for TDS, and <br />application of the untreated water to the soils of Salazar Ranch has potential to leach arsenic to <br />the ground water. AM-03 attempts to address the fluoride and manganese but does not appear <br />to address the arsenic and TDS. Please address the issues identified in the attached staff <br />memos from David Bird and Allen Sorenson. Pursuant to Rule 3.1.5(11), AM-03 must <br />demonstrate that no unauthorized release of pollutants to ground water will occur from any <br />materials mined, handled or disposed of within the permit boundary. <br />Therefore, an adverse impact on ground water quality may reasonably be expected and <br />pursuant to Rule 3.1.7(7)(a), the Division requires a ground water monitoring plan sufficient to <br />verify compliance with Rules 3.1.6(1)(b) and 3.1.7(1)(b). Under section G.4.2.1, the Applicant <br />proposes to verify compliance for the 281-acre irrigation area with only one monitoring well, <br />SLM-2. SLM-2 is located on the south permit boundary approximately 3,500 feet and down- <br />gradientfrom the application site, and approximately 2,000 feet and up-gradient from the Town <br />of San Luis water supply wells. SLM-2 is located at the most distant down-gradient opportunity <br />for a point of compliance, and as such, appears to benefit from the maximum opportunity for <br />attenuation and dilution. of contaminants. However, being proximal to the permit boundary, <br />SLM-2, as the solitary monitoring well for the irrigation activity, inappropriately minimizes <br />opportunities for remediation necessary to prevent off-site damage. <br />