My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (325)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (325)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:12 PM
Creation date
5/1/2008 9:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/15/2008
Doc Name
VOL II Appendix 2, Hydrologic Evaluation Report
From
CC & V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Grassy Valley hydrologic conditions 33 <br />Environmental Protection Agency, 1994) was used to estimate the percentage of <br />precipitation to the ECOSA becoming runoff during the post-closure period based on the <br />properties of the low permeability cover, the grading profile, the vegetation cover, the <br />properties of the overburden material, and site-specific climate data. It is estimated that the <br />runoff rate will be about 13.5 percent of precipitation.. This runoff rate is evaluated further in <br />the sensitivity analysis, Section 4.4.9. <br />Infiltration <br />It is assumed that the majority of infiltration to the alluvium in Grassy Valley becomes shallow <br />interflow and reports to Grassy Creek. An infiltration rate to the shallow alluvium of 0.5 <br />inches per year (2.6 percent of precipitation) was used in the base case modeling <br />simulations. Infiltration that does not route to shallow interflow and to surface flow in Grassy <br />Creek infiltrates the diatreme or granite bedrock. Infiltration rates of 15 percent and 30 <br />percent of precipitation to the granite and diatreme bedrocks, respectively, were used in the <br />current conditions modeling simulations. The effect of changes to these estimated bedrock <br />infiltration rates is evaluated in the sensitivity analyses, Section 4.4.9. <br />Although water is expected to infiltrate into the ECOSA during mining, no throughflow is <br />expected. The ECOSA is not expected to receive enough precipitation to reach field <br />capacity during build out activities. Infiltration is expected only to raise the moisture content <br />of the stockpiled overburden. <br />In the post closure period, precipitation which does not run off the ECOSA will either <br />evapotranspire or infiltrate the ECOSA. The demands of ET are met first in the model, and <br />with the enhanced runoff from this facility, there is a limited amount of water available to <br />meet the potential ET requirement. Therefore, simulated actual ET for the ECOSA is often <br />significantly lower than potential ET. Any water in excess of runoff .and potential ET is <br />assumed to become infiltration to the ECOSA. Post-closure infiltration to ECOSA is <br />approximately 0.25 inches of precipitation of the 18.9 inches falling on the whole of Grassy <br />Valley, or equivalent to about 1.8 inches of water per year falling onto the ECOSA. <br />The HELP model also was used to estimate the percentage of precipitation becoming <br />infiltration to the backfilled WHEX portion of the East Cresson Mine following closure. The <br />HELP model analysis was based on the properties of the growth medium cover, the grading <br />profile, the vegetation cover, and the properties of the backfill material. It is estimated that <br />the runoff rate will be about 1 percent of precipitation and the infiltration rate will be about 17 <br />percent of precipitation. <br />Areas <br />Areas were delineated and calculated in GIS for use in water balance calculations of <br />precipitation, ET, runoff and infiltration. In subsequent sections of this report, these areas <br />are referred to as `segments' of Grassy Valley drainage. Table 4.4 presents the calculated <br />areas used in the water balance for current, mining and post-mining conditions. <br />• <br />2736 Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Water Management Consultants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.