My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (325)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2008-04-15_REVISION - M1980244 (325)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:12 PM
Creation date
5/1/2008 9:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/15/2008
Doc Name
VOL II Appendix 2, Hydrologic Evaluation Report
From
CC & V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Grassy Valley hydrologic conditions 31 <br />is assumed that any water infiltrating the low permeability cover will flow through <br />the ECOSA and drain towards the main diatreme. <br />• Water draining from the regraded areas upgradient of the ECOSA will flow to <br />Grassy Creek (near GV-02), or will flow towards the backfilled WHEX portion of <br />the East Cresson Mine and will infiltrate the backfill and drain towards the main <br />diatreme. <br />4.4.5 /nput data <br />Simulation settings <br />The GoldSim water balance model was run for one year using daily time steps. Monthly <br />average values for precipitation, evaporation and ET are used in the model. Using a daily <br />time step with monthly input data improves model accuracy by reducing the magnitude of <br />parameter value changes between time steps. <br />Precipitation <br />Average monthly precipitation data are reported in Table 2.3. These monthly values and the <br />annual average precipitation also are shown in Table 4.2. Some precipitation falls as snow <br />during the winter months. Average snowfall data for Victor, CO (Section 2.0) was used to <br />estimate snowfall for Grassy Valley. Asnow-water-equivalent of 11 percent was selected <br />such that the estimated snowfall contained a similar amount of water to the average monthly <br />' precipitation. It was necessary to adjust the snowfall data slightly to give the appropriate <br />amount of precipitation during each month. Water stored as snow is released to the <br />drainage during the'spring. There are no data available for the snow melt rate in Grassy <br />Valley, therefore this rate was used as a calibration ,parameter. Table 4.2 presents estimated <br />snow fall rates and snow melt rates, together with monthly precipitation rates. <br />Table 4.2 Monthly precipitation and snow data used in water balance model <br /> Average monthly Average monthly Average monthly Snow-water- Snow melt <br /> Precipitation* rainfall snowfall equivalent (inches <br />_ (in) (in) (in) (in) of water) <br />Jan 0.6 0.0 5.7 0.6 0.0 <br />Feb 0.6 0.0 5.0 0.6 0.0 <br />Mar 1.3 0.0 12.0 1.3 0.0 <br />Apr 1.4 0.0 12.6 1.4 2.0 <br />May 1.6 1.3 3.3 0.4 2.0 <br />Jun 1.8 1.8 0.1 0.0 2.6 <br />Jul 4.3 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 <br />Aug 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 <br />Sep 1.5 1.4 1.3 0.1 0.0 <br />Oct 1.1 0.0 10.0 1.1 0.0 <br />Nov 0.6 0.0 5.5 0.6 0.0 <br />Dec 0.5 0.0 4.6 0.5 0.0 <br />Total 18.9 12.3 60.1 6.6 6.6 <br />"Smith Williams Consultants, Inc, March 2008. <br />Evaporation/ Evapotranspiration <br />2736 Cripple Creek & Victor Gotd Mining Company <br />Water Management Consultants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.