Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Erica Crosby <br />RE: Weld County: Hokestra Pit <br />April 3, 2008 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />The rate of rise for this analysis was assumed to be 4000 cfs per hour. This number was <br />determined after evaluating several nearby hydrographs on similar drainages. Once this was <br />determined a model of the reservoir was constructed to evaluate different spillway widths. <br />According to Urban Drainage's recommendations the spillway size for reservoirs II and N would <br />be 19 ft and 11 ft respectively, however they also recommend a minimum width of 100 ft. <br />The analysis for reservoir II was performed for 4 following scenarios: <br />• A 20 ft spillway, and a full reservoir at the start of the flood <br />• A 20 ft spillway, and a half full reservoir <br />• A 100 ft spillway, and a full reservoir <br />• A 100 ft spillway, and a half full reservoir <br />A review of the existing HEC-RAS model revealed that the river berm would overtop. uniformly <br />as the river rose. Therefore water coming into the pit over the river berm was modeled as a broad <br />crested weir 1300 ft wide with a.weir coefficient of 2.8. The results of this modeling are attached. <br />These results show that if the reservoir was to be half full at the start of the flood the maximum <br />difference in water surface elevation across the river berm fora 100 ft wide spillway would not <br />be significantly different than a 20 ft wide spillway. Furthermore the amount of water <br />overtopping the river berm would require 9" D50 riprap on the pit side slope in both cases. <br />Therefore, it was determined that it is more economical to build a small, 20 ft wide spillway and <br />riprap the entire river berm to 3 ft below the invert of the river, than build a 100 ft wide spillway <br />that would also require armoring of the river berm. The small spillway will serve to release any <br />flood waters entering the reservoir during a flood event as well as prevent the reservoir from <br />exceeding the maximum normal water surface elevation during filling. The spillway will be . <br />located in the northeast corner of the reservoir and spill into the adjacent slough. The riprap for <br />the river berm was sized using several sources which are also attached. The proposed armoring <br />for the river berm is 9" D50 riprap placed 18" thick on top of a 9" thick layer of type II bedding. <br />A similar analysis was performed for Reservoir IV but only for the half full reservoir scenario <br />since that is the more conservative approach. The reservoir was evaluated for 11 ft and 100 ft <br />wide spillways as well as a 24 inch pipe spillway. The pipe size was selected based on the <br />maximum anticipated flowrate (15 cfs) entering the reservoir via an interconnect pipe from <br />reservoir II. The pipe spillway would pass the incoming flow without allowing the reservoir to <br />overtop and would also serve to release,any accumulated flood storage after a flood event. The <br />river berm was assumed to be 800 ft long: The results of the analysis revealed that by installing a <br />100 ft spillway the rock diameter protecting the river berm could be decreased to 6" D50. <br />However due to the presence of the gas line a pipe spillway and slightly larger riprap, 9" D50 or <br />engineer approved equal, was the most economical solution. <br />Exhibit F has been updated to show the approximate spillway locations. <br />b. The DRMS expressed a concern regarding the potential for erosion of the berm between <br />reservoirs II and N during an overtopping event. The proposed berm between reservoirs II and <br />N is consistent with the adjacent approved reclaimed mined areas. Reviewing the flooding <br />characteristics modeled by the HEC-RAS model and the models discussed above, the only <br />scenario where flood water overtopping this berm would have a significant rundown into <br />reservoir N would be if reservoir N was significantly lower that reservoir II at the start of the <br />flood. The pump station which will serve the surrounding reservoirs is located at the northwest <br />corner of reservoir IV thereby making reservoir N the last reservoir in the chain before making <br />\\Hercules\projects\06125 Hokestra lining\DMG permit\SubmittalWdequacy review\Reply2.docx <br />