My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-07_REVISION - M1980149 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980149
>
2008-04-07_REVISION - M1980149 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:39:00 PM
Creation date
4/9/2008 11:32:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980149
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/7/2008
Doc Name
Adequacy review comments
From
Applegate Group, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Email Name
ESC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ - ~~ ~~ v% <br />Applegate / <br />,- <br />z; Group, ~~~. <br />Apri13, 2008 ~ ~~ii~~ V <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources APR a 7 ~oo~ / ' . <br />.Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />Attn: Ms. Erica Crosby Division of ~teciamation, <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 Mining and Safiety ~. <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RE: Adequacy Review Comments #2; Weld County; Hokestra Pit; M-80-149 / <br />Dear Ms. Crosby: <br />This letter is provided in response to the adequacy review comments dated March 10, 2008. Thank you <br />for taking the time .to review our responses. We appreciate your time and effort regarding this project and <br />feel that we have adequately addressed your concerns. <br />1. A map showing all adjacent land owners has been provided. Adjacent landowners were also added to <br />Exhibit C-1. <br />2. The application has been revised to reflect the approved (AR-04) permit boundary acreage of 172 <br />acres.. <br />3. The stability analysis indicates that the slopes of reservoir III and 1V which will be surrounded by a <br />slurry wall will be stable. The XSTABL model assumed the following. <br />• The slurry wall will be minimum of 12 feet from the reservoir embankment. <br />• Gaslines are located outside of the slurry wall. <br />• ~ The slurry-wall does not infringe upon the easements for the existing gaslines. <br />• Reservoir slopes are at a 4:1 and are native sand and gravel. <br />' • The material properties for the shale bedrock-were taken from on-site tests. The sand and <br />~~ gravel properties are from the Bureau of Reclamxation's "Design of Sma11 Dams", Third <br />Edition, 1987. These properties are shown in the table accompanying the answer to <br />comment 5 in this letter. <br />The model was run in both a rapid draw down condition and a static condition. The model showed <br />.that the reservoir side slopes were stable.. A factor of safety of 1.74 was. generated in the rapid. <br />drawdown scenario. The static scenario produced a slough failure with at a factor of safety of 2.83. <br />Neither failure plane impacted the slurry wall. The gaslines will be outside of the slurry wall, and <br />therefore their stability was also not affected. The results of this analysis are attached. <br />During construction where-the slurry wall crosses the gaslines, the County will have crossing <br />agreements with the gasline companies and supply copies of those agreements to the DRMS before <br />construction of the slurry wall begins.. _ <br />1499 West 120th Avenue, Suite 200 - (303) 452-661.1 • Fax {303) 452-2759 <br />Denver, Colorado 80234-2759 www.applegategroup.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.