Laserfiche WebLink
~~ ~~ ~ J LLieJU 1G JJI- I-ICUI I LY71YV R.1~71-I I J .~UUI'i~~1L 117b (C1VJ `I7 <br /> <br />~ rC <br />Ubaldo F. Padilla <br />~I~tl1 U v Li,„~ <br />P.O. Box 495 <br />207].4 County Rd P.6 ~ -. _ <br />San Luis CO 81152 `~ `' ~,- <br />~ ~`e/l In l,~ ~., l .,~,~ to ,.. ' 3 <br />MAR 10 200 <br />March 3, 2008 <br />Wallace Erickson, Environmenta! Protection Specialist <br />701 Camino del Rio, Room 315, <br />Durango, CO 81301 <br />Phone (970) 247-5469 and FAX number (970) 247-5104. <br />Ronald W. Cattany, Director <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation Mining & Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Erickson and Mr. Cattaa~y and others Whom Concern: <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safety n <br />~6 e~lv n ~r, ~ ~ ~ 0.3 <br />J <br />Sa„ ~~~.~ P~of~ <br />M~~gBS-i~z <br />This letter constitutes notice that many entities and individuals in Southern Costilla County, including <br />Las Comadres de San Luis y el Condado de Costilla, the Rio Culebra Agruicultural Cooperative, the <br />Costilla County Committee for Environmental Soundness (CES), The Acequia Associations and <br />Organizations, The Costilla County Commissioners, the Town. of San Luis, and others objecting to <br />the proposed Permit Amendment 3, DRMS Permit No. M-88-112, filed by Battle Mountain Gold on <br />December 2007. <br />WE do not believe that we were properly notified of this application. The Valley Courier is not our <br />local media source. Las Comadres de San Luis were informed of this application on 2.27.08, just <br />prior to the deadline. Because you do not hear from this community, please do not ass-u-me~-.that <br />there is no opposition. <br />We do not believe that the Mined Land Reclamation Board has the authority to grant Battle Mountain <br />Gold water rights to irrigate the property formerly known as the Shalom Ranch, now being called the <br />Salazar Ranch. The MLRB cannot grant a change of industriallmining water to agriculture use. Nor <br />should they be allowed to put water on land that has no water rights, <br />I personally join the other entities from my community in contesting the assertion by Battle <br />Mountain Gold that the West Pit water is now ofpre-mining quality. 1 am very concerned about the <br />contamination of the farmland, which is adjacent to the Centennial School District and the residents <br />in the State's oldest Town of San Luis. <br />I further object to: <br />1. A proposal to close the water treatment facility located near the Rito Seco Creek on the Battle <br />Mountain Gold (BMG) property. <br />I further object to: <br />2, A proposal to in-igate the BMG property, formerly known as the Shalorn Ranch, now being <br />called the Salazar Ranch; with water that should have been processed tlu-ough the water <br />treatment plant which is currently in operation. <br />