Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: M-2008-050 <br />INSPECTION DATE: 7-23-08 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS GRM <br />This inspection was conducted as part of the normal monitoring program established by the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining and Safety for mine permit applications. The October Mine Ore Stockpile is a proposed <br />reclamation project located south of John Brown Canyon above Gateway, Colorado. The 0.46 acre project is the <br />removal of approximately 7,500 tons of pre-law ore stockpile that was left in place and uncapped. Nuvemco has <br />proposed the removal of the ore stockpile and reclamation of the stockpile area. Mick and Sue Carter, <br />representatives for Nuvemco met DRMS inspector Russ Means on site for this pre-operational inspection. Peter <br />Hayes, Michael Cunningham and Jared Ebert of DRMS also accompanied the inspector on site. <br />The Public Notice required under Rule 1.6.2(b) was observed at the base of the ore stockpile area. Proposed permit <br />boundaries were marked with t-posts painted orange at the top for easy identification. <br />The ore stockpile is noted to take up approximately a '/ acre of the proposed disturbance area. It appears that the <br />stockpile was placed over existing topsoil and strata. During reclamation the ore pile was not capped or re- <br />vegetated. The inspector has raised a concern as to whether material proposed for topsoil at the bottom of John <br />Brown would be beneficial. The piles located below have been in place for some time and little or no vegetation <br />growing on them. A visual inspection notes the material is mostly rock debris and materials from a wash with little <br />organics or other beneficial nutrients. Based on the site observations, DRMS is recommending removal of the ore <br />stockpile and assessing the footprint. It may be that topsoil was covered up or a rock ledge was utilized. If topsoil <br />was covered up then placing less suitable materials over it may not be beneficial. If there is a rock ledge, no re- <br />vegetation would be required to begin with. <br />Approximately 30 yards from the north edge of the proposed activities is a structure believed to be a sweat lodge. <br />BLM is in the process of evaluating the site and requested measures be taken to protect the site. To the south on the <br />other side of the small drainage is a BLM classified historical site. The mine camp is noted with debris from past <br />mining activities and has also been noted as being important to protect. Based on the protection requirements for the <br />camp a change in the proposed plan will be required. The inspector notes that there appears to be room on the west <br />side of the county road to create a turn around for trucks which will pull up short of the camp area. The applicant <br />agrees with this assessment and has submitted an amended map to note the change prior to publication of the public <br />Notice. <br />The ore pile sits on a relatively flat bench with drainages adjacent to but not in the permit area. Relatively simple <br />stormwater measures can be employed to prevent sedimentation from impacting the drainages for the short duration <br />of this project. <br />The inspector notes no noxious weeds within the permit area but knapweed and Canadian thistle have been observed <br />in the general area. The applicant should be prepared to address these weeds as part of the overall reclamation plan. <br />No issues are noted that are not being addressed through the normal review process.