My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-07-21_PERMIT FILE - M2008009 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008009
>
2008-07-21_PERMIT FILE - M2008009 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:34:49 PM
Creation date
7/25/2008 1:52:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008009
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/21/2008
Doc Name
Follow-up to 07/10/2008 memo
From
Water Resources Consultants, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />RECEIVED <br />JUL 2 5 2008 <br />Division of Declamation, <br />WATER RESOURCE CONSULTANT-991y 9LLC;,/ <br />July 15, 2008 r/ <br />Mr. Steve Baker <br />3B Enterprises, LLC <br />POB 1665 <br />Craig, CO 81626 <br />RECEIVED <br />JUL 2 12008 <br />GRAND JUNCTION FIELD OFFICE <br />DIVISION OF <br />RECLAMATION MINING 8 SAFETY <br />via e-mail and First Class Mail <br />Mr. Travis Marshall via FAX and First Class Mail <br />Dept. of Natural Resources <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />101 South 3rd Street, Suite 101 <br />Grand Junction, CO 81501 <br />RE: Lyster Pit, 112 Permit Application, Craig, CO. M - Z? o` - ooh <br />Water Resources Evaluation - <br />Follow-up to July 10, 2008 memo from Kate Pickford <br />Steve and Travis, <br />This letter provides a follow-up to our letter of July 3, 2008, and the Division's response of July <br />10, 2008. We've also incorporated results of our telephone discussions yesterday and today, as <br />well as my e-mail of 7/14/2008. <br />Per the e-mail I sent yesterday, and our discussions, we have the following comments and <br />observations: <br />1. Based on boundary conditions (river, irrigation ditch, waste ditches in the area), the <br />groundwater gradient in the area of the proposed Lyster Pit is generally east to west, <br />somewhat parallel with the river. There is also a slight south to north component, that is <br />due to irrigation water and drainage ditches. <br />2. The valley in this area doesn't appear to be influenced much by "sub-irrigation." I <br />observed the water table on site last week at about 18" below the surface of the ground., <br />While that's high enough to keep deep rooted grasses wet, its not high enough to <br />produce good pasture or hay crops. So surface irrigation is needed to produce good <br />crops, which is the historical practice in the area. This indicates to me that seasonally <br />induced "hydraulic mounding" occurs via irrigation. <br />3. As for the domestic wells, my report last week pointed out the wells that actually have <br />well completion reports on file with the State Engineer, which were as deep as 1,000 feet <br />deep. There is no public record that other wells for which permits have been granted <br />were actually drilled or completed. The State Engineer's record includes the following <br />wells in the alluvial valley surrounding the proposed pit. SEO data sheets are attached. <br />244 Hutton Ave., Rifle, CO 81650 PH / Fax (970) 625-5433 pcurrier@wrc-Iic.corm
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.