Laserfiche WebLink
locations that appeared to be likely deposits. Sometimes it showed good sand, other times it showed <br />nothing. Backhoe pits were established as far south as the affected land boundary would allow and <br />only a couple of little pockets were found. Due west of the former ranch headquarters no sand was <br />' found anywhere. Another small sand pocket was found west of the road near a small structural fill <br />pit. <br />i <br />At this time, it appears that essentially all of the sand in the original permit area has been <br />depleted and all the other unmined areas contain either no sand or sand of such low quality it would <br />be questionable whether mining it would even make sense. <br />HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED: No groundwater was encountered in any <br />of the mining pits operated in the past year. Surface drainage, once all the snow?melted in 2007, <br />returned to a fairly normal pattern. No heavy flows were seen in Coal Creek all summer long and any <br />flow that did occur was mainly a superficial trickle. <br />That said, the hydrology of the area did improve greatly in 2007, especially along Coal Creek. <br />Deep soil moisture increased greatly as the snow melt water worked its way down into the subsoil in <br />the uplands and this translated into robust growth of the more deeply rooted grasses. Blue grama, in <br />some places, was one to two feet tall when normally it is little more than about six inches tall. <br />Wheatgrasses and needlegrasses reached upwards of two feet and produced a great deal of seed. <br />Along Coal Creek, cottonwoods showed very little moisture stress and appeared to have good <br />leaf turgidity through nearly the entire summer. Only the very old trees near the edge of the groves <br />continued to show some decline, but even those seemed to sometimes show a youthful vigor. <br />But by the start of the 2008 growing season all of those excellent growing conditions in 2007 <br />had been lost. Subsoil once again became depleted resulting in sometimes deep cracking of the <br />upland soils. Grass and forb growth was weak at best and in most areas showed nothing more than a <br />few leaves and very little flowering. Only very deeply rooted forbs made a fair showing during early <br />2008. <br />Along the stream channel, stress returned. Although the trees looked good most of the spring, <br />by early July evidence of stress was once again apparent. There are still good outflows in the channel <br />where the groundwater under the sandy stream bed appears, but it is a bit lower and less in volume <br />than last year and stagnated pools are once again evident. Most of the younger cottonwoods and <br />willows though showed good early growth. Wetlands along the stream bottom continued to show <br />excellent condition. <br />If a strong monsoon arrives some good growth could yet occur this year and relieve the tree <br />stress some, but unless it is very strong this year may result in a net loss over last; year's gains. Such <br />patterns, although of concern, are normal in semi-arid grassland and in riparian forest along streams <br />and rivers in semi-arid lands. Thewegetation is well adapted to such conditions and even though long <br />term drought may cause a tremendous decline in native vegetation cover, this vegetation has an <br />incredible ability to gain back a lot of the losses in even a single season. If the plants could not do <br />that then they would not even live there. However, a drought in excess of about 10 to 15 years would <br />basically destroy the vegetation as it would not be able to recover in any reasonable period of time. <br />With such a prolonged, continuous drought of that scale the vegetation would need to rebuild itself <br />and it is likely what would result would not be like what was there before. But it would be even <br />better adapted to survive even more intense drought. That is the way natural selection works. <br />Status report for 2007 (July 15, 2007) Page 4 of 10