My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-07-18_PERMIT FILE - M2008006
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008006
>
2008-07-18_PERMIT FILE - M2008006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:34:45 PM
Creation date
7/18/2008 1:25:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008006
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/18/2008
Doc Name
CDOT objector letter & response
From
Applegate Group, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.0 Legal Storage of Water <br />Water shall not be impounded in the reservoir except pursuant to lawful diversions <br />allowed by statute or decree. At all other times, all inflow of water into the reservoir from <br />any source, including precipitation and ground water inflows shall be removed by the <br />applicant. The water can be removed by draining, pumping, or other means, and <br />released to the stream system, without use by the applicant in any manner. The <br />applicant shall install the necessary measuring devices, including but not limited to, staff <br />gauges in the reservoir and account on a monthly basis (or more frequently if required) <br />for inflow and outflow, evaporation, precipitation, change in storage and any seepage. <br />Prior to making any storage right absolute, the applicant shall develop and submit to the <br />Division Engineer graphs showing height-storage relationships. Under no circumstance <br />may the applicant withdraw more water from the-reservoir than the measured inflow with <br />appropriate evaporation and seepage losses being deducted. <br />7.0 Retained Jurisdiction <br />The Water Court shall retain jurisdiction to address injury to water rights caused by <br />failure of the liner that results in ground water inflow exceeding the Performance <br />Standard. Upon a prima facie showing by the State or Division Engineer or the party <br />invoking the retained jurisdiction that such exceedence of the Performance Standard is <br />occurring, and that reasonable efforts to correct the problem have been unsuccessful, <br />and that injury to water rights is being caused thereby, the Water Court will proceed to <br />hear evidence regarding the additional terms and conditions, or limitations and <br />restrictions, that should be imposed upon the operation of the pit.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.