My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-07-18_PERMIT FILE - M2008006
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008006
>
2008-07-18_PERMIT FILE - M2008006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:34:45 PM
Creation date
7/18/2008 1:25:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008006
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/18/2008
Doc Name
CDOT objector letter & response
From
Applegate Group, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Garv DeWitt <br />RF. SerFer Pit <br />July 3, 2008 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />must be approved by the Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety prior <br />to installation. <br />Considering a combined overburden and gravel thickness of 12.5 feet, as stated <br />on page 3, and using the acres of the reservoir and the capacity shown on page 7, <br />there will only be approximately 1.5 feet of bank above the water level of the <br />reservoir. We request that the portion of the reservoir paralleling SH 392, and <br />the NW and NE corners be protected with rip rap to help preclude wave action <br />erosion on the banks. We also request that the setback be increased to a <br />minimum of 50 feet along the CDOT ROW. <br />A wave run-up calculation was performed to estimate the wave crest for <br />varying wind speeds. Denver data from the National Climatic Data Center <br />reports that the prevailing wind direction is from the north in gusts up to <br />62 mph with mean wind speeds of 9-10 mph. As a result, it is likely that <br />wind driven wave erosion will occur primarily along the southern <br />embankments. The wave run-up calculation estimated wave peaks of 2.0 <br />ft. for 100 MPH winds. Future Right of Way and setbacks place the limit <br />of mining approximately 60 feet from Highway 392. Wave run-up <br />calculations determined that rip-rap is not necessary for the embankment <br />slopes. <br />® Page 11 states that the site is within the Cache La Poudre River 100 year flood <br />plain, and all work will conform to Larimer County Flood Hazard Regulations. <br />People from Larimer County and Windsor indicated that Windsor Flood <br />Regulations would be followed. Could this be clarified and could the applicants <br />- - plan-for-complying-be-made availablefor- review? -We-are-again-concerned about <br />potential negative impacts on SH 392. <br />As of the date of this response, a floodplain permit application is being <br />prepared for submission. Mining will not commence prior to the approval <br />of the floodplain permit. A copy of the floodplain permit application is <br />included as an attachment to this letter. <br />There is a sizeable (15'+ wide and 10'+ deep) ditch along the north edge of the <br />pit area. Much of this ditch is in the setback area. What are the plans for this <br />ditch, will it be abandoned, mined, backfilled, left as is? How does the flood plan <br />and drainage plan address this ditch? This ditch starts at least a mile north, <br />appears to run along the west side of the Kyger Gravel Pit, through a pipe under <br />Highway 392, continues through the affected area, and drains into the Poudre <br />River. Will disturbing this ditch divert flood water onto CDOT ROW? This ditch <br />is visible on the maps, but is unlabeled and we could find no mention of how it <br />would be handled. At least a portion, if not all, of the ditch was man made.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.