My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-07-14_PERMIT FILE - M2008022
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008022
>
2008-07-14_PERMIT FILE - M2008022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:34:38 PM
Creation date
7/16/2008 3:49:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008022
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/14/2008
Doc Name
Rational for recommendation for approval over objections
From
DRMS
To
Various
Email Name
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. Bonded and Loniz Term Responsibility. Deep Cut has concerns regarding bonding and long <br />term responsibility. <br />DRMS has calculated the estimated reclamation liability for this site. The liability by law <br />covers the cost to reclaim the site after mining is completed. Staff updates this estimate <br />periodically to ensure there is an adequate bond to complete reclamation. Deep Cut noted "the <br />project should be set back several hundred feet further to protect the intake channel, the head <br />gate, irrigation ditch and access road." The applicant has done that with the removal of the 3 <br />acres within the 100 year flood plain. The Division has no jurisdiction beyond 200 feet of the <br />affected area or for agreements beyond the life of the mine. DRMS staff notes that the <br />applicant has submitted a "Promise to Correct" to Deep Cut for any damages to structures <br />within 200 feet and related to mining activities. The Division noted Deep Cut Ditch received <br />the "Promise" but has not formally signed the agreement. Based on Rule 6.4.19 (b), where <br />such an agreement cannot be reached, the applicant shall provide engineering evaluation that <br />demonstrates that such structure shall not be damaged by activities occurring at the mining <br />operation. Based on the information provided to the Division's engineer, the distance and <br />depth of excavation present no issues of stability for structures within the 200 foot <br />jurisdictional limitation. The Division feels the estimated bond meets the requirements of the <br />law to cover the reclamation liability and requested long term agreements are beyond its <br />jurisdictional authority. <br />7. Water Contamination. Deep Cut has concerns regarding possible water contamination from <br />asphalt processing and other chemical spills. <br />The submitted plan does recognize the possibility of an asphalt plant on site from time to time. <br />Initial discussions with a sub-contractor may in fact eliminate the possibility of on site <br />processing as materials will be hauled off site for such activities. But it is important to note <br />that this does not preclude a plant from being brought in. Rule 3.1.7 addresses impacts to <br />groundwater quality. The Division uses this rule as a point of basis for an oil and spill <br />containment policy. By policy a permit holder is required to notify the EPA, Colorado Health <br />Department and Division within 24 hours of any spill of a reportable quantity of any fuels or <br />chemicals. The application notes fuels will be brought in by portable equipment and none will <br />be stored on site. An asphalt clean up plan has been submitted to ensure that reject and <br />overspill are cleaned up weekly if processing is underway and that no asphalt materials are <br />placed in an area where they can come in contact with water. These are standard requirements <br />for all permitted sites and the applicant has addressed them accordingly. The Division feels <br />that the applicant has met the minimum requirements of the Act and Rules regarding this <br />matter. <br />Staff has attempted to answer the above referenced issues with as much detail as possible. The responses are <br />not intended to be all encompassing and other factors may have been weighed in the final decision process.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.