Laserfiche WebLink
15 <br /> signed for work to be conducted on a portion of Dr. Corley' s <br /> Doctor Corley also alleged that trespassing had <br /> property. ro <br /> occurred on his property.Y• <br /> ect that <br /> Mr. Long said that Dr. Corlre est for the Board tated wanted the rtolconsider <br /> he had submitted a timely Qu <br /> this matter. <br /> In response to an inquiry from the Board, Mr. Long said that, <br /> based on the letter, the Division agreed that Dr. Corley <br /> complaint in early August clarified that Dr. <br /> submitted a comp related to the <br /> Corley' s complaint, as stated in h He saidethe Division plans <br /> issue of trespass on his property. Mr. Long said <br /> to investigate Dr. Corley' s complaint. However, <br /> the Division was not prepared to go <br /> that, at this time, He requested that the Board <br /> forward with this matter. and allow <br /> continue this matter to the futte ure <br /> matte Board Meeting <br /> the Division time to <br /> from the Board, Dr. Corley stated <br /> In response to a question o forward with the matter at this <br /> that he was prepared to g object to the <br /> time. However, he stated that he would not ob7 <br /> Division' s request to continue the matter to a future Board <br /> Meeting. <br /> The Board continued this matter to the October 1993 Board <br /> Meeting. <br /> 18 FORMAL pUBLIC HEARING File No. C-81-037 <br /> d with <br /> THE CORLEY COMPANY the o erator, provided the Boar <br /> Doctor W. D. Corley, P which related <br /> _ background information, regarding this matter, <br /> to his request that the Board s a revoked schedule for <br /> site. <br /> completion of reclamation work <br /> previous operator, GEC, <br /> Doctor Corley stated that when <br /> permit was revoked, with a <br /> ceased operations about 19831 left at the site. He le <br /> considerable amount of disturbance being related to an area <br /> said that a portion of the disturbance, timber of this year <br /> called Section 24, will be reclaimed in Sep <br /> by the Division. The bidding process for the work on Section <br /> erned <br /> 24 was completed last week. However, eosaid Sect he ion 24 would <br /> s cO <br /> that the bonadequatmaining after e for or the remaining reclamation of the East Pit . <br /> not be adequ <br /> Doctor Corley showed slides and discussoss biled a itl flthagt <br /> Energy Fuels, and the p Y <br /> company in the area, rather than <br /> company depositing its coal waste into the pit, <br /> backf illing. <br /> Staff clarified that, according to the State statute,aste onuan <br /> be illegal for a permitted operation to deposit <br />