My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-05-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981037
>
2000-05-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2021 8:51:47 PM
Creation date
7/14/2008 3:31:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
5/24/2000
Doc Name
PKA-0-457
Permit Index Doc Type
Reclamation Projects
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Corley Company <br /> Phone 632-5050 P.O.Boa 1821 <br /> COLORADO SPRINGS.COLORADO 80901 A <br /> ,BUG <br /> Oct. 29, 1993 1J J9 <br /> 9� <br /> Mr. Daniel I. Hernandez <br /> Division of Minerals 6 Geology <br /> 1313 Sherman St. <br /> Denver CO 80203 <br /> Dear Mr. Hernandez: <br /> We have several comments regarding your draft of the proposed East Pit <br /> reclamation. <br /> While the entire plan consists of one written page and several topo maps <br /> and cross—sections, there are not sufficient specifics to be entirely <br /> certain of the intent of some of the tasks. <br /> However, task 1 would reduce Chen's Hill to 3H: IV and cut 35 feet from <br /> the top. Cross—section EE' does not demonstrate a 35' cut. The topo <br /> "Chens Hill Final" does not show any cut of the top in comparison to <br /> "Chens Hill Existing 2V: IH". Of greater importance is the elimination <br /> of the existing road. While task 3 would reestablish access to the <br /> Monarch fan, there is no indication of the location or timing of the new <br /> road. Energy Fuels, one of our neighbors, and ourselves need continuous <br /> access. While Energy could use access through another alignment, our <br /> neighbor cannot enter through Energy's tipple area. <br /> Task 2 is not specific about diversion ditches or dozer basins with <br /> regard to size or location. <br /> Task 3 does not specify the- new- road- location.--- - - - - - - <br /> Task 4 does not specify saving topsoil in the 100 foot cut area. Do you <br /> really want D10s working up to the edge of the high wall? The "East Pit <br /> Final Contour 2V: 1H" map would seem to have the wrong title. 2V: IH? <br /> Kind of steep. <br /> Task 5 calls for 62,000 cu. yd. of topsoil in present stock piles. Is <br /> that a realistic volume? Additional topsoil if needed would be taken <br /> from the east side. Is it a good practice to rob an undisturbed area? <br /> Task 6 does not specify the seed mix, amount or method of seeding, <br /> mulching, or other additive. <br /> With regard to cost estimates, four D1ONs and two 627s are the bases of <br /> the estimates. Since there are no D10s and probably no 627s in the <br /> area, the mobilization estimate of $6000 is extremely low. I doubt that <br /> the new road can be established for $1 , 100, and supplies for the <br /> revegetation will cost more than $300 per acre assuming that usual <br /> r.evegetation - practices, are- used. - - -- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.