My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-03-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981037
>
1999-03-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2021 6:43:36 PM
Creation date
7/14/2008 3:28:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
3/30/1999
Doc Name
PKA-0-457
From
DRMS
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Reclamation Projects
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Walker to Berry <br /> March 30, 1999 <br /> Page 2 of 5 pages <br /> Grades range between 7 and 15% in the lower reaches of the drainage way. Concrete drop <br /> structures have been installed, but intermittent grades are too steep, and this reach is being <br /> eroded. Enclosure 6 and 7 are of this reach. Note on these enclosures that the channel appears to <br /> be in a state of equilibrium for approximately one-half(or less) the distance between the drop <br /> structures. Field measurements (tape and inclinometer) indicated that nearly exactly half the <br /> required (to arrest erosion) number of structures were installed. For these soil conditions, each <br /> pair of drop structures, the top of a downstream structure should be at or slightly above the <br /> bottom of the upstream structure. As installed, there is approximately a height of structure <br /> separation of the two. To reach a state of equilibrium (near a 1% grade), the upper reaches of the <br /> channel between two structures are eroding. The lack of(or loss of) an energy dissipating <br /> structure at the base of the drop structures results in a depression (circular basin) at the base, in <br /> some cases approximately 4 feet deep. These basins are cutting back under the drop structures, <br /> and underflows of the structures are just a matter of time. The channel is in a state of erosion <br /> below such basins to the lower reach that is in equilibrium. <br /> Drop st ture <br /> Active erosion equilibrium <br /> undercu� <br /> Drop ructure <br /> The drop structures appear to have been constructed without a discharge weir. Shallow weirs <br /> were subsequently chipped out. Low flows appear to be the rule, as the shallow weirs have been <br /> sufficient to keep most of the undercutting localized to the center of the channel. <br /> Road crossings act as drop structures. Areas below the crossings indicate.conditions similar to <br /> the drop structures. <br /> Note areas of green on the left side,just below the center, of the picture at Enclosure 2. This is <br /> an area of small ponderosa pine trees. <br /> Suggestions: <br /> High Priority <br /> 1. Add intermittent drop structures in the lower reaches of the drainage channel. Five or six are <br /> required. The bottom and top of the new ones would overlap the tops and bottoms of existing <br /> structures. The purpose of this action is to arrest erosion in the steep lower portion of the main <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.