My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMIT FILE - 7/11/2008, 11:29:45 AM-JWD
DRMS
>
Public
>
PERMIT FILE - 7/11/2008, 11:29:45 AM-JWD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2019 9:21:00 AM
Creation date
7/11/2008 3:55:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
P2007069
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/9/2008
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #3
From
RPM, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. The answer to this question is closely related to the issue briefly stated in the request for <br />clarification under adequacy answers received by the DRMS on March 31, 2008, number 6.e. Please <br />note that Rule 5.1.2 does say, in part, that the operator must specify "the measures to be taken to <br />reclaim any affected land consistent with the applicable requirements of Rule 3.1. Among the <br />provisions of Rule 3.1., is Rule 3.1.7 pertaining to ground water protection. Also, please note that Rule <br />5.3.6 requires the prospector to conduct all prospecting"... in such a manner as to comply with all <br />applicable local, state and federal laws, including but not limited to air and water quality laws and <br />regulations..." The DRMS must ensure, as the agency with primacy in protecting ground water quality <br />at DRMS regulated sites, that the prospector is meeting applicable ground water quality provisions. As <br />such, please specify the amount of material to be stores underground, the location of underground <br />storage and the characteristics of the waste rock. Also see the discussion under March 31, 2008 <br />number 6.e. for ground water sampling requirements. <br />Response: COAG Corporation wants to clarify that it will not be producing waste rock; rather it <br />intends to bulk sample from existing tunnel and stope rubble. Therefore, it will not be adding <br />additional rubble or waste rock to what already exist under ground, but will be removing some of the <br />material for analysis. <br />5. Adequate. <br />6. Adequate. <br />Enc(1) Revised site map (The DRMS already has a One Site Prospecting Bond on file.) <br />One additional note, COAG Corporation is placing in the record the instability that has been created by <br />persons other than COAG Corporation on the out-slope of the bench. A significant drainage ditch has <br />been cut at the toe of the slope creating sloughing. COAG Corporation verbally brought this to the <br />Division's attention. The sloughing is extending from outside the area COAG Corporation has shown <br />as its intended affected area on to the affected area, creating a potential safety hazard during <br />prospecting operations. COAG Corporation respectfully requests that the Division address the <br />instability as part of its Franklin Mine site reclamation. <br />Respe ly, <br />H. Bruce Humphries <br />Consultant <br />RPM, Inc. <br />cc: COAG Corporation <br />Mr. Mickey Fouts, CHR and CEO <br />200 S. Wilcox St. #402 <br />Castle Rock, Co 80104
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.