My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-21_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (46)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-03-21_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (46)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:25:41 PM
Creation date
6/20/2008 3:24:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/21/2008
Doc Name
pg 2.05-200 to 2.05-300
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.6 Mitigation of Surface Coal Mining Operation Impacts Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />Flows from the mine vary as pumps in the mine cycle on and off as sumps fill and empty, and/or <br />a precipitation event occurs. This option was also labor and maintenance intensive, requiring <br />handling of bulky containers, and electrical and piping maintenance in several remote locations <br />on the mine site. <br />Phvsical Treatment <br />Five alternatives were evaluated. One alternative was unsuccessful, because it was ineffective in <br />removing the small particle-sized suspended solids. A Multi-media filtering pilot plant was <br />unable to handle higher flows, nor capture the small particles (98% of the suspended solids were <br /><10 microns) in the dirty mine water. Scalping (cyclones) and ponding the coarse material was <br />evaluated, however, even through the specific gravity of the suspended clay was 1.82, the fines <br />were small enough to travel with the water and would not separate in the cyclones without <br />chemical addition to coagulate the solids. The solids also needed to be more concentrated and <br />consolidated (i.e., in a filter press) for economic disposal. Athickener/clazifier with chemical and <br />sand addition was also evaluated. The process could treat the entire volume of mine water, or <br />scalped portions, and delivered consistent results. On the downside, the process required <_10 <br />percent solids in the feed and the system required two chemical elements and sand, increasing <br />the maintenance and overall costs. Centrifugal separators were evaluated, however, power <br />consumption and the problems that plagued the cyclone alternative (described above), also <br />contributed to the centrifugal sepazator ineffectiveness. Dissolved air flotation (DAF) was <br />considered, but because of sparging (external air source), large bubbles occurred with chemical <br />• addition and caused foaming (similar to a washing machine that has been overloaded with soap), <br />and therefore did not effectively float clays and silicates. Induced air floatation (IAF) with a <br />single chemical addition was also considered. "Mini-bubbles" were formed (by induction, rather <br />than spazging), the clays floated to the surface and a froth was formed that could be easily <br />skimmed from the water. The downsides were that a large amount of chemical could be <br />required, the cost of that chemical, and the process was a relatively new technology. <br />In the mine MCC can minimize total suspended solids in mine water by: (1) Channeling water <br />out of roadways wherever possible. (2) Utilizing imported gravel for mine roadways with less <br />clay in the fines. (3) Segregating better quality water for direct dischazge. (4) Utilizing tanks or <br />small, lined dams, etc. to collect clear water from inflows for direct dischazge. (5) Treating the <br />particles with the largest mass first (i.e, with baffles or dams constructed in the sumps). <br />MCC used the NW Panels sealed sump to reduce mine water outflows to assure that the <br />hydraulic capacities of the sedimentation ponds would not be exceeded and that NPDES permit <br />limits would be met. In light of the problems experienced with the effective treatment of TSS in <br />the fault inflow water, the use of previously mined own-dip sealed panels for storage reservoirs <br />(or sealed panel sumps) is a key component of MCC's overall mine water management program. <br />MCC will utilize the NE Panels sealed sump along with the new, lazge capacity (up to 2,000 <br />gpm) water pumping facility, to optimize MCC's water management system. The Sylvester <br />Gulch Mine Water Pumping Facility (MWPF) is described in Exhibit 69, The MWPF went <br />. online in 2000 and remains the primary discharge for mine water at West Elk Mine. <br />2.05-115 Revised November 1004 PRIG; Rev. March 2006; Rev. May 2006 PRIO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.