Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />• All water supplies aze obtained from MCC's water rights in accordance with Colorado Water <br />Law. The freshwater pond is filled during spring runoff and kept full until water rights are out of <br />priority, then the leased water from the Lost Lake Slough (a.k.a. the East Beckwith Reservoir <br />operated by the Fire Mountain Canal and Reservoir Company) is used. The current maximum <br />withdrawal at the intake is 450 gpm. The lazge fault inflows experienced by MCC in 1996 and <br />early 1997 have not significantly changed the amounts or schedules of water diversions from the <br />North Fork. <br />The potential effect of diversions on North Fork flows have been quantified for both flow rates <br />and flow volumes. Percent changes in flow rates in the North Fork for combinations of <br />streamflow and diversion conditions are provided in Table 47 and Table 48. In most cases, the <br />percent change is within the estimated 5 percent error of streamflow measurement at the USGS <br />gaging station on the North Fork. With the existing pump capacity, the diversion would result in <br />measurable change in flow only for low flows with return periods of about 200 yeazs or greater. <br />During these extreme low flow periods, MCC's water rights would be out of priority and <br />diversions would not be made. Normally MCC's water rights would be out of priority when <br />river flows drop below approximately 300 cfs during the growing season. In this case, percent <br />changes in river flows would be less than the 0.4 percent as shown in Table 48. <br />Estimated percent changes in North Fork flow volumes due to withdrawals for projected mine <br />requirements are provided in Table 48. Even in a drought year, the mine water requirements <br />anticipated during term of permit are only about 0.1 percent of the North Fork flows. Thus <br />fisheries, streamside vegetation, and sediment transport process would be unaffected. <br />Furthermore, anticipated changes in river flows due to withdrawals would have no effect on sub- <br />imgation or flood irrigation of alluvial valley floors on the North Fork downstream of the mine. <br />An important factor to consider relative to Table 47 is that fault inflows to the mine are not <br />accounted for, yet a significant amount of mine water is actually discharged to the North Fork, <br />thus offsetting MCC's depletion. Since the fault inflows began in 1996, MCC has been a net <br />exporter of water from the mine to the North Fork on an annual basis. <br />Table 49 contains actual and projected water usages for West Elk Mine. These numbers aze <br />projections for abuild-up of tonnage and increases in water usage, which are entirely dependent <br />on coal sales and market conditions. <br />Table 47 <br />Estimated Percent Chan a in North Fork Flow Volumes <br />Annual North Fork Total Volume Net Net Depletion <br />Streamflow Case (AF) Requirement Requirement 63 AF <br /> 88 AF 70 AF <br />Avera a Year 313 000 -0.03 -0.02 -0.02 <br />1 in 25 dry year 142,300 -0.06 -0.05 -0.04 <br />e.. 1954 <br />1 in 100 dry year 82,270 -0.11 -0.09 -0.08 <br />e.. 1977 <br />~ Cases considered are water years (i.e., October through September). <br /> <br />205-221 Revised November 2004 PR/0; Rev. March 2006; Rev. May 2006 PR/0 <br />