My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-21_PERMIT FILE - C1980007 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-03-21_PERMIT FILE - C1980007 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:25:38 PM
Creation date
6/20/2008 11:15:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/21/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 78 Dry Fork Federal Lease-By-Application COC-67232 Final Enviro Impact Statement
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.7 <br /> <br />• <br />Chapter 3 <br />feet above mean sea level. Groundwater that <br />surfaces in these springs and seeps in the LBA tract <br />area is associated with shallow alluvial/colluvial <br />deposits and does not appear to be hydrologically <br />connected with deeper bedrock aquifers. Static <br />water levels in bedrock aquifers in the West Elk <br />Mine area are many hundreds of feet below ground <br />surface and show no connection to surface water <br />sources. Based on the estimated overburden in the <br />LBA tract in the Deep Creek drainage (1,100 to <br />1,500 feet) and the maximum estimated fracture <br />zone thickness above longwall panels (380 feet), it <br />does not appear that the perennial springs will be <br />affected by fracture zone-induced drainage. In <br />addition, there is low risk of alluvial/colluvial <br />springs being intercepted by subsidence-induced <br />tension fractures. The lowering of the land surface <br />may cause springs to migrate a few feet, but no <br />discernable loss of water is anticipated. <br />Surface-tension cracks in areas of bedrock cover <br />may intercept precipitation. It is expected that the <br />cracks would temporarily divert precipitation away <br />from the drainage, but that given the expected <br />limited depth of tension cracks (less than 200 feet), <br />the flow would remain in the drainage (USDA <br />Forest Service 2003a). In addition, surface and <br />groundwater resources may be temporarily <br />interrupted. due to drainage into fractures that <br />develop; however, these fractures tend to be short- <br />lived, terminate at a shallow depth, and quickly fill <br />with sediment. Given the ephemeral and seasonal <br />nature of the surface drainages as well as their steep <br />gradient, and influences of the natural geologic <br />instability of the area (landslide potential and high <br />erosion rate/sediment load), subsidence would have <br />minimal long-term impact on channel morphology. <br />Surface and groundwater impacts would diminish <br />rapidly as cracks associated with the longwall face <br />will tend to close after the face passes. Surface <br />cracks that remain open are normally not significant <br />conduits to surface water since they tend to die out <br />a depth (maximum 200 feet) due to the location of <br />the neutral surface and crack intersection with soft <br />material (Agapito 2005, see Appendix B). <br />Appendix C identifies potential lease stipulations to <br />protect or mitigate effects on water, including <br />monitoring needs to assess possible water loss. <br />Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences <br />Alternative C <br />Under this alternative, the stipulation in Appendix <br />C for protecting Deep Creek would be included in <br />the lease. Effects on water resources would also be <br />the same as for Alternative 13 except that the life of <br />the mine would be slightly shorter, and there would <br />be no potential for subsidence to impact Deep <br />Creek, as mining would not be permitted <br />underneath it. Surface water flow or changes in <br />channel morphology resulting in alteration of <br />surface gradient, increases in soil erosion, or <br />landslide potential would not occur under Deep <br />Creek. <br />Potential post-lease surface use (exploration <br />drilling, methane drainage, ventilation shaft <br />construction, etc.) has the potential to affect surface <br />water through surface disturbance related to drill <br />pad and road construction. Depending on the <br />location of these activities, construction could have <br />impacts on sedimentation. in stream channels; <br />however these effects can be mitigated through use <br />of best management practices. These activities have <br />not been noted to cause impacts to groundwater. <br />Any proposed post-lease activities would be <br />analyzed under a separate NEPA analysis if/when <br />those activities are proposed. <br />3.3.4.2 Cumulative Effects <br />Alternative A <br />The No Action alternative would have no <br />cumulative effects on the :Dry Fork LBA tract, as <br />mine development would not occur. There would be <br />no surface water or groundwater impacts from the <br />LBA. Any past or existing conditions as a result of <br />longwall mining in the West Elk Mine would <br />continue. Specifically, dewatering operations for <br />the West Elk Mine would continue as needed. The <br />CDI-Il'E would continue to regulate treated water <br />discharge through the existing NPDES permits. <br />Natural variability due to climatic variations, flow <br />regimes, and geologic variations would continue to <br />occur. <br />Alternative B <br />Leasing the coal in the Dry Fork LBA would extend <br />the life of the West Elk Mine, thereby increasing <br />the potential for indirect :impacts to surface water <br />Dry Fork Lease-By-Application FEIS <br />3-23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.