My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-21_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-03-21_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:25:42 PM
Creation date
6/20/2008 11:15:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/21/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 60E Subsidence Evaluation for the South of Divide & Dry Fork Mining Areas
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
longwall panels E6 and E7. However, based on observations made by Dunrud above the Somerset <br />Mine in the Bear Creek area, subsidence cracks are not expected to occur in the Dry Fork alluvium <br />where the overburden depth ranges from 375 to 800 feet. No cracks, and no change in stream flow, <br />were observed in the Bear Creek alluvium (estimated to be 10 to 15 feet thick) when coal was <br />extracted by room-and-pillar methods at depths ranging from 220 to 300 feet beneath Bear Creek <br />(Bureau of Land Management, et al., 2002). <br />The probable reason for the lack of cracking in alluvium is that the fine sand- to clay-sized material <br />and overlying soil yields without cracking or bulging as it deforms as a discrete unit, or as discrete <br />units, in the subsidence process. This same reasoning also applies to the colluvium in the area. <br />Although subsidence cracks were locally observed in colluvium less than one foot to a few feet <br />thick, no cracks were observed in colluvium more than about ten feet thick. No cracks have been <br />observed in alluvium above mined longwall panels in the Apache Rocks and Box Canyon mining <br />areas. <br />It is important to continue ongoing surface-water monitoring in the Dry Fork, Lick Creek, and Deep <br />Creek drainages in order to compare the historic information derived from annual subsidence <br />observations in the West Elk Mine area with field observations in selected areas of the South of <br />Divide and Dry Fork mining areas. Subsidence depressions, slope changes, and strain are <br />projected to occur above longwall panels E2 through E8 in Dry Fork and its tributaries and in Lick <br />Creek when the panels are mined. Subsidence depressions, slope changes, and strain aare also <br />projected to occur above longwall panels E3 and E4 in Deep Creek when the panels are mined. <br />The maximum subsidence amount, slope change (tilt), and strain are projected to occur above solid <br />coal barriers and mined longwall panel boundaries, such as above the west ends of longwall panels <br />E2 and E3, where the shallowest overburden occurs. Depressions, ranging in depth from 8.4 to <br />11.2 feet, are projected in this area. Maximum changes in slope (tilt), ranging from 1.3 to 6.4 <br />percent, are also projected for this area. The maximum horizontal tensile and compressive strain is <br />projected to range from 0.7 to 4.2 percent. Subsidence depressions and slope changes will be less <br />above the gate road pillars than above solid coal barriers, because they are projected to yield <br />during mining by as much as 4 feet (Table 2). <br />No subsidence depressions or changes in stream gradient were observed in Deep Creek, located <br />about 1,050 feet above mined longwall panel 17 during the annual traverse in July 2004 (Dunrud <br />2004a). There was no observable change in stream gradient or in stream flow. The depression and <br />change in gradient were apparently sufficiently gradual, so as to not be perceived by Dunrud during <br />his traverse along the trail by the stream. <br />11.3.1 Potential for Hydraulic Connection Between Mine Workings and Surface <br />Near the southwest corner of longwall panel E2, the Dry Fork channel encounters a short reach <br />where the E Seam overburden is less than 400 feet, with a minimum of 375 feet. A prudent concern <br />is whether mining induced subsidence could establish a hydraulic connection between the Dry Fork <br />stream channel and the mine workings. To address this scenario, the maximum projected height of <br />fracturing and the maximum depth of surface cracks were considered. As discussed in Section 5.2, <br />the effective height of fracturing in the South of Divide and Dry Fork mining areas is estimated to <br />range from 9t to 18t, or a maximum fracture height of 252 feet for a mining height of 14 feet. <br />However, Peng (1992) states that the upper one-third of the fractured zone has only minor fractures <br />with little potential for water conductivity. Therefore, the height of the fractured zone capable of <br />transmitting water would be two-thirds of the 18t, or 168 feet. <br />The maximum height of the caved zone is projected to be 5t, or 70 feet, for the South of Divide and <br />Dry Fork mining areas. When added to the effective fracture zone height of 168 feet, the combined <br />heights of the caved and fracture zones capable of transmitting water is projected to be a maximum <br />of 238 feet. <br />Tetra Tech - 090717/P 26
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.