Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />Tremors generated by bumps and rock bursts in the Somerset Mine area attain magnitudes that have <br />shaken structures in the West Elk Mine area and have been felt sometimes by West Elk Mine <br />personnel. These local tremors may affect underground workings, landslide or potential rock fall <br />areas, particularly during prolonged periods of increased precipitation. It is noteworthy, however, <br />that the Rulison nuclear shot in 1969, which produced a tremor with a Richter magnitude of 5.2 <br />(many times greater than the magnitudes of any recorded bump or rock burst), did not affect the <br />Somerset Mine, and did not trigger any known landslides or rockfalls. <br />In contrast to microcseismic effects generated by bumps and rock bursts that are sometimes felt at <br />the surface a mile or more from room-and-pillar mining operations, the initial cave in a longwall <br />panel may well generate the largest seismic event. In some longwall mines which have thick and <br />strong roof rocks, the initial cave may not occur for several hundred feet, and thus, can generate a <br />shock wave through the mine and overburden that can be felt at the surface for considerable <br />distances from the mine. However, the initial observed cave in the West Elk Mine occurs in 0 to 45 <br />feet from the start of the panel. MCC has experienced no measurable microseismic events at the <br />surface due to initial longwall caving and bumps originating from the mine. Because roof conditions <br />are similar in the Apache Rocks and Box Canyon mining areas, MCC does not anticipate any <br />different microseismic effects in these areas than has been experienced in the current mining area. <br />It is important to note that mining plans for the SOD area do not include undermining the reservoir <br />or the escarpments adjacent to the reservoir. In fact, Minnesota Reservoir is located outside of the <br />angle of mining influence of the nine projected panels (panels E1 through E9) for the South of <br />i Divide mining area. The northwest corner of panel E9, which is nearest to the reservoir, is <br />located 800 feet away. The angle of draw to this nearest area of nijuing is 69°. The angle is <br />much greater than the maximum of 20° projected for the SOD mining area. This means neither <br />Minnesota Reservoir or Monument Dam will not be subsided or be within the angle of draw of <br />longwall mining in projected panel E9. <br />The potential for landslides, rockfalls, and other seismic impacts to Minnesota Reservoir are <br />discussed in detail in the preceding sections titled "Potential Impacts of Subsidence and Mine- <br />Induced Seismic Activity on Landslides and Rockfalls" and "Effects Of Subsidence And Mine- <br />Induced Seismic Activity On Man-Made Structures And Renewable Resources - Minnesota <br />Reservoir". As stated in these previous sections, field observations during the past nine years <br />(1996 through 2004) indicate landslide movement occurs in response to moisture and ground <br />saturation, and is not noticeably affected by subsidence or any mine-related seismic activity <br />caused by longwall mining beneath or near the landslides. Additionally, records of seismic <br />events in the immediate area of the West Elk Mine provided by the NEIC indicate that since <br />1983, the largest event registered 3.60 on the Richter scale and occurred on June 20, 2002. No <br />evidence was observed that this event resulted in new or renewed movement of landslides in the <br />mine area or damage to Mlonument Dam or Minnesota Reservoir. A coal bounce measuring 3. <br />on the Richter scale occurred in the mine area on October 10, 2004 and no impacts to surface <br />features or structures vas noted. flistorically, coal bounces in the area have been recorded in the <br />range of <2.0 to 3.3. None of these events appear to have impacted the area landslides, and in <br />particular, Monument Dam or Minnesota Reservoir. As indicated in the GEI report contained in <br />Exhibit 72, it is unlikely that mining in the SOD will result in seismic events greater than 23. <br />2.05-160 Revised Jayne 200.1 PRIO, Rev. Alar•ch 2006; A1ay 2006 PRIG, Alov. 2006TR107,Apri12007TR108;Sep. 2007 PR12; Feb. 2008 PR-12