Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />In terrains with slopes less than about 30 percent, the depth of the neutral surface can be <br />estimated by dividing the maximum horizontal strain values by the maximum curvature values at. <br />a given location. The calculated depth of the possible tensile zone to the neutral surface, ie: the <br />boundary between tension above and compression below-ranges from about 50 to 100 feet in <br />the subsidence monitoring network at West Elk Mine. Crack depth may be much less than this <br />projected 50 to 100 foot range of maximum values. An unpublished study for the U.S. Bureau of <br />Mines (Engineers International) indicated that surface crack depth rarely is greater than about 50 <br />feet. Cracks will also be less extensive or terminate where shale and claystone layers occur. <br />Based on annual field subsidence observations, maximum crack depth in bedrock in the South of <br />Divide muting area is estimated to be (1) 5 to 15 feet in terrain sloping less than, or equal to, 30 <br />percent (2) 10 to 35 in terrain sloping more than 30 percent, and (3) 40 to 50 feet in thick, brittle <br />sandstones in ridges (Exhibit 60B, Table 2). <br />Crack depth will likely be at a maximum value above massive coal barriers. Crack depth may <br />therefore be greatest above the 700-foot-wide protective barrier system projected between longwall <br />panels E4 and E5 (Exhibit 60B, Figure 1). The crack depth is projected to be less (probably 10 to <br />20 percent less) above the panel chain pillars, where even the rigid pillars are predicted to yield 10 <br />to 30 percent of the coal extraction thickness (Exhibit 60B, Table 2). <br />Cracks that occur above the mine panel area also tend to close, once mining faces move out of the <br />surface area of influence (DeGraff and Romesburg 1981). Any local bed separations during active <br />subsidence between rocks of different strengths (Exhibit 60B, Figure 1) will likely close once <br />equilibrium conditions occur. However, any cracks present above rigid chain pillars, barrier pillars, <br />or mine boundaries may remain open where permanent tensile stresses remain after mining is <br />completed due to the convex curvature of the subsidence profile. <br />During the past nine years of annual observations in the West Elk mining area by Mr. Dunrud <br />(from 1996 to 2004), particularly in the Apache Rocks mining area, no cracks were observed <br />above mined-out longwall panels in colluvium more than an estimated ten feet thick. No cracks <br />have been observed in alluvium above mined-out long`vall panels. <br />No cracks were observed in the alluvium and colluvium of Sylvester Gulch and Deep Creek (estimated <br />thickness range: 25 to 150 feet) during periodic field observations in the Apache Rocks and Box Canyon <br />mining areas. The near-surface alluvial material consisted of primarily sand, silt, clay, and soil in the two <br />areas mentioned, and was located above rigid pillars and panel boundaries-where the overburden depth <br />ranges from 800 to 1,050 feet. The alluvium and colluvium in Sylvester Gulch, Dry Fork, and Lick Creek <br />drainages (estimated thickness range: 25 to 75 feet), on the average, contains more clay than does the Deep <br />Creek alluvium. Therefore, it is very unlikely that cracks will occur in colluvium and alluvium in the <br />stream valleys of Sylvester Gulch (Panel 25) or the South of Divide mining area even considering the <br />shallow overburden. <br />The probable reason for the lack cracking in alluvi,.tm is that the fine sand- to clay-sized material <br />and overlying soil can yield without cracking or ,ul?gir?g as it deforms as a discrete --it, or units <br />during in the subsidence process. The alluvium observed by Mr. Dun rud during geologic <br />mapping activities also varies in thickness from more than ten feet to many tens of feet in the <br />West Elk mining area, including the South of Divide mining area. This same reasoning also <br />applies to the colluvium in the area. Although subsidence cracks were locally observed in <br />2.05-133 Revised June 2003 PR10, Rev. Alarch 2006; Alay 1006 PR10, A'ov. 2006TR107..4p7-i12007TR108; Sep. 2007 PR12; Feb. 2008 PR-12