Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mize <br />40 In addition, Mayo and Koontz (2000) report horizontal hydraulic conductivity values for the Rollins <br />Sandstone from in-mine permeameter testing between 2.4 x 10-3 and 1.3 x 10-1 ft/d. These data <br />show that, with the exception of the fractured portion of the formation, the permeability of the <br />Rollins Sandstone is low. In fact, Mayo (1998) states that of the fifteen analyzed core samples <br />taken from. the Rollins Sandstone between the BEM and 14HG Faults, only one "had sufficient <br />penneability to transmit water" and "the low permeability of all other samples make them effective <br />barrier to groundwater flow." <br />This is further documented in the permit revision submittal and decision documents for the Jumbo <br />Mountain (PR-05, 10/21/94), Apache Rocks (PR-06, 1/26/96), Box Canyon (PR-08, 1/25/00) areas, <br />where it is reported that drill holes which penetrated the Rollins Sandstone near the Orchard Valley <br />Mine (now Bowie No. 1 Mine) had an insufficient yield to sustain groundwater supply wells. <br />As discussed previously, groundwater monitoring wells completed in the Rollins Sandstone do not <br />provide reliable information on the groundwater systems within the unit (Mayo and Associates 1998 <br />and 1999). In addition, the groundwater systems are not areally extensive and not in hydrodynamic <br />communication with each other. For these reasons, MCC does not plan to continue monitoring <br />or complete any additional monitoring wells in the Rollins Sandstone, because it has <br />concluded that this formation does not produce sufficient quantities of groundwater for <br />beneficial use. A review of SEO permitted wells in the vicinity of the West Elk Mine confirms <br />that there are no water wells producing from the Rollins Sandstone. <br />i However, the information obtained from Rollins Sandstone monitoring well observations <br />have played an important role in understanding the interaction of this major beach/offshore <br />bar deposited sand with the damaged zones associated with the BEM and 14HG Faults. From <br />these observations, Mayo and Associates Exhibit 18B has been able to make correlations to <br />the Bowie Sandstone (of similar depositional history, mineralogical composition, geometry, <br />and structural architecture to the Rollins Sandstone) as it relates to the proposed E Seam <br />mining in the South of Divide permit revision area. <br />Assuming an average gradient of 0.05 in the mine workings, an average horizontal porosity of 0.01 <br />(Mayo and Associates, 1998), and a horizontal connectivity of 1.0 x 10-4 to 1.0 x 10-2 fud, the <br />average horizontal seepage velocity in the Rollins Sandstone would range from .18 to 1.8 ft/yr. <br />However, these calculations have limited value for predicting flow rates in the compartmentalized <br />Rollins Sandstone. The journal article Mayo and Koontz (2000), demonstrated that the Rollins <br />Sandstone ground water systems, in the mule permit area, occur as hydraulically isolated bodies that <br />are not horizontally continuous. <br />• <br />2.04-64 Revised June 2005 PRIG, March 2006; Rev. April 2006 PRIG, Sep. 2007PR12