My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-05-08_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981018A
>
2008-05-08_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:31:14 PM
Creation date
6/19/2008 1:26:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/8/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Section V. Mine Surface Facilities Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• instantaneous peak discharge (Figure 7 and ES-1027, NRCS TP-149) using a type It storm <br />distribution. Runoff flow rates for designing diversion ditches were determined in the same manner <br />as above using a 10-year, 24-hour storm in accordance with Section 4.05.3. Runoff flow rates for <br />the Refuse Disposal Area diversion ditches were determined using a 100-year, 24-hour storm. <br />With the exception of Refuse Area Pond RPSA, outlets for the sedimentation ponds typically include <br />a principal drop-inlet spillway and an earth emergency spillway. RPSA was constructed with a <br />combination principal and emergency spillway as depicted in Map 80A. Principal spillways are <br />constructed of corrugated metal pipe (CMP) and consist of a riser extending to the top of the <br />combined sediment and runoff storage pool and a conduit extending through the embankment (see <br />the pond design drawings, Maps 34, 78, 79, 80 and 80A). <br />Detention time was determined as the difference between the inflow and outflow hydrograph <br />centroids after appropriate routing. The DEPOSITS sedimentation pond model developed by the <br />University of Kentucky was used to route the inflowing hydrograph (generated by the WASH <br />subroutine) through the ponds to determine detention times. Resulting pond performance <br />information is contained in Illustrations 4, 5, 6, and 7. <br />All primary spillways were sized to pass the peak flow resulting from the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall <br />event using charts contained in Chapter 6 of the NRCS Field Engineering Manual. A maximum <br />• head of 1.0-foot above the riser crest was allowed during passage of the design peak flow. The <br />peak flow used for initial design was the unrouted inflow determined by methods described in <br />TP-149. This inflow rate was compared with the peak inflow rate generated by the WASH <br />subroutine of the DEPOSITS model to determine if any adjustment in spillway sizing was <br />necessary. In all cases, the larger of the routed flow hydrograph generate by WASH or the peak <br />flow generated using TP-149 was used for final primary spillway sizing, resulting in a somewhat <br />conservative size estimate for the spillway. Final primary spillway sizing took into account orifice <br />flow into the riser perforation, orifice and wier flow into the riser, and pipe flow through the spillway <br />conduit. <br />All risers are fitted with a splitter-type antivortex device and trash rack at the entrance, as suggested <br />by Chapter 6 of the NRCS Field Engineering Manual. Specific details can be found on the pond <br />drawings shown on Maps 34, 78, 79, 80 and 80A. <br />All emergency spillways were designed to safely pass the unrouted peak inflow rate resulting from <br />the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event. The emergency spillway on pond DP-1 was also sized to pass <br />the unrouted peak inflow rate resulting from the 100-year, 24-hour storm. Spillway dimensions <br />were based on criteria set forth in Section 4.05.3 and in NRCS Technical Release TR-35 (LID <br />Method of Reservoir Flood Routing). All spillways are constructed in non-fill earth material and are <br />appropriately lined with riprap to allow a maximum outflow velocity of 12 feet per second during <br />passage of the design peak flow, thereby reducing erosional hazards. <br />• <br />Mid-Term Review 2002 (8/2002) V-11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.