Laserfiche WebLink
111111. COMMENTS - COMPLIANCE <br /> Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations <br /> made during the inspection. Comments in Section IV describe any enforcement actions <br /> taken during the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br /> Page 1/1 North Thompson Creek C-81-025 <br /> 2 June 2008 c � <br /> This was a complete inspection of the North Thompson Creek Mine conducted on 2 June 2008 by Jim <br /> Stark of CDRMS. The mine has been reclaimed and the operator has applied for a final Phase III Bond <br /> Release(a termination of jurisdiction for the site). The Division is still considering this application. <br /> The weather was warm and sunny and the ground was dry. <br /> Availability of records: All of the necessary records were available at the Garfield County <br /> Courthouse in Glenwood Springs. See the records checklist at the end of this inspection for more <br /> details. <br /> Signs and Markers: -All of the mine Id signs were in place. This included the portal 1 and portal 3 <br /> areas. <br /> Roads: - The access road to the treatment ponds was in good condition and appeared to be stable at the <br /> time of the inspection. The road is becoming overgrown with grasses due to lack of use. <br /> Hydrologic Balance: - The long pond was in good condition and appeared to be stable at the time of <br /> the inspection. Both the#1 and the#3 portal were discharging at the time of the inspection. There was <br /> a large amount of staining at the pond but it appeared to be doing its job. See pictures at the end of <br /> the report. <br /> - The two treatment ponds (T1 and T2)were both full at the time of the inspection. T1 was <br /> discharging to T2 and T2 was discharging to the river. There discharge was clear and there was no <br /> iron staining on the rocks at the discharge point (see picture at the end of the report). The pond <br /> embankments were stable and well vegetated and there were no erosional problems noted. The T2 <br /> pond was also discharging/routing water to sediment pond P9 through the overland ditch. <br /> - Sediment pond P9 contained a small amount of water from T2 but was not discharging at the time of <br /> the inspection. The pond embankment was well vegetated and appeared to be stable. No erosional <br /> problems were noted on the embankment. <br /> Backfilling and Grading: - The sinkhole at the#3 portal appears to be stable. There was a good <br /> amount of vegetation growing on the area. See picture at the end of the report. <br /> - The backfilled#1 portal remained stable and well vegetated at the time of the inspection. No <br /> cracking or settling was noticed. <br /> Processing Waste: -The two small holes/depressions that appeared in the refuse pile have been <br /> repaired and there were no signs of them at the time of the inspection. Overall, the refuse pile was very <br /> well vegetated and stable. See pictures at the end of the report. <br />