Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS - COMPLIANCE <br /> Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br /> during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br /> and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br /> This partial inspection of the King Coal 1 Mine was conducted by DRMS staff from the Durango Office, <br /> located at 701 Camino del Rio, Room 315, Durango, CO 81301, phone (970) 247-5469. Operations <br /> were active during the time of the inspection. Thirteen photos accompany this report. <br /> The sediment containment system for the King Coal 1 Mine was functioning as designed, evidence of <br /> affected area drainage escaping the area prior to treatment was not observed. However, maintenance <br /> for portions of the upland diversion ditches and sediment containment system appears essential to <br /> ensure their continued function, as discussed below and/or shown in the photos. <br /> As shown in photos one through five, maintenance is required for the east upland diversion ditch to <br /> include, but not limited to, the removal of dead fall debris from the rock-lined section of the ditch and <br /> sediment clean-out from the upper unlined portions of the ditch to ensure adequate capacity, <br /> configuration and function in accordance with the approved designs. The lower portion of the east <br /> upland diversion ditch, located downstream of the culvert section, appeared well maintained and <br /> stable. Regulated noxious weeds previously observed at the outlet of the east upland diversion ditch <br /> were not observed. <br /> As shown in photo eight, the culvert inlet for the west upland diversion ditch was partially obstructed by <br /> minor rock fall. Although not photographed, the culvert outlet for the west upland diversion ditch, <br /> which outlets to the lower portion of the east upland diversion ditch located immediately behind the <br /> scales house, was partially obstructed by sediment. Removal of the partial obstructions at the inlet <br /> and outlet of the culvert section of the west upland diversion appears necessary to ensure its <br /> continued function in accordance with the approved designs. All other portions of the west upland <br /> diversion ditch appeared well maintained and stable. <br /> Affected area drainage is conveyed to either of two sediment ponds by a combination of culverts, <br /> ditches and berms. Affected area drainage from the Refuse Disposal Pile (RDP) and the south end of <br /> the yard area are conveyed to the north end of the yard area by a culvert approximately 250 feet long <br /> (under-yard culvert). As shown in photo nine, the debris screen for the inlet of the under-yard culvert <br /> has eroded sufficient to allow cobble sized sediment to enter the culvert. A second inlet for the under- <br /> yard culvert was partially obstructed by earthen berms and dismantled equipment (photos 10 and 11). <br /> As shown in photo 12, the outlet of the under-yard culvert, located adjacent to the truck scales, was <br /> partially obstructed by sediment. <br /> The large sediment pond was holding a minor amount of water, approximately four inches in depth. <br /> Water level appeared well below the inlet elevation for the primary spillway. The embankment <br /> appeared stable with no evidence of seepage, slumping or erosion. The open channel secondary <br /> spillway and overflow PVC pipe to the small sediment pond appeared clear and functional with no <br /> discharge noted. As shown in photo 13, a regulated noxious weed, Whitetop, was established on the <br /> pond embankment. <br /> The small sediment pond was dry. The embankment appeared stable with no evidence of seepage, <br /> slumping or erosion. Primary and secondary spillways appeared clear and functional with no <br /> discharge noted. Evidence of recent maintenance grading at the pond inlet was apparent. <br /> Drainage from the short portion of the mine entrance/haul road located outside of the sediment pond <br /> treatment area is treated for sediment by three small sediment traps with filter fabric. The three <br /> sediment traps appeared well maintained and capable of functioning as designed. <br />