My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (290)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (290)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2021 7:13:18 AM
Creation date
6/6/2008 1:02:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
12/1/1987
Doc Name
Revegation Information
Section_Exhibit Name
Chapter V Appendix V-G-1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in ngRmounwnioiL <br /> contribute 8.0 percent and 6.9 percent relative cover, respectively, averaged over all <br /> plots. The most abundant forb, in terms of relative cover, is cicer milkvetch, with 8 <br /> percent relative cover averaged over all plots. Blue aster and ox-eye daisy contribute <br /> 4.4 percent and 4.7 percent relative cover,respectively, averaged over all plots. <br /> Table 3 shows vegetation production data. These data are summarized in Table 4. <br /> Average production over all plots is 10.8 g 0.25m-2 (oven-dry). The highest producing <br /> species is orchardgrass at 3.3 g 0.25m-2 (oven-dry), averaged over all plots. Bromar <br /> biorrie and orchardgrass contribute 1.4 g 0.25m-2 (oven-dry) and 1.3 g 0.25m-2 (oven- <br /> dry) total production, respectively, averaged over all plots. Cicer milkvetch and blue <br /> aster contribute 0.7 g 0.25m-2 (oven-dry) and 0.6 g 0.25m-2 (oven-dry) total produc- <br /> tion,respectively,averaged over all plots. <br /> No shrubs were encountered in either transect or quadrat sampling. One small rose <br /> (Rosa sp.) seedling was observed in one plot. <br /> 0ualiitative Observations <br /> The,spoil material appears suitable as a plant growth medium. Moisture is not limiting. <br /> Growth of introduced species, in particular, is enhanced by fertilization. Long term <br /> maintenance fertilization may be required for these species to survive. The lack of long <br /> term fertilization would probably favor native species adapted to low fertility <br /> environments. Another significant limitation to long term growth and survival is the <br /> shore: growing season. Plant species must either be able to reproduce vegetatively or be <br /> able to produce seed within a short season. It is too early to tell whether this will be a <br /> limitation for some species growing on the plots. <br /> By far the most limiting factor in successfully revegetating these sites is the steep <br /> slopes. Surface instability due to sloughing and creeping can prevent new plant <br /> establishment. This effect is apparent at all three plot locations, where the upper <br /> portions of the plots exhibit significantly greater vegetation cover than the lower parts. <br /> It is not known to what extent this may also be due to ineffective seed coverage on the <br /> lower parts of plots when the plots were seeded. Although such structures are never <br /> permanent, berms, furrows or benches may provide enough temporary relief from <br /> surface instability to allow more uniform initial establishment from top to bottom. <br /> Revegetation of these slopes might further be enhanced by planting live seedlings or <br /> cuttings of woody plants. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.