Laserfiche WebLink
• -33- <br /> Subsidence effects include fracturing of the material overlying the coal for a <br /> distance of 30 to 40 feet due to caving of the roof material and surface <br /> subsidence and possible development of tension cracks on the surface due to <br /> differential settling. Ground water inflows during mining are expected to be <br /> minimal : 5 to 10 gpm. In 1 ractured areas, increased flows of 100 to 300 gpm <br /> may be encountered for a short period of time. These flows will diminish as <br /> equilibrium is reestablished. Due to the low transmissivities of the <br /> aquifers, if caving should create a hydraulic connection from the mine to an <br /> aquifer within 30 to 40 feet of the coal , the additional inflow will be <br /> minimal . It is not probable that fracturing from the mine to. the surface will <br /> occur as a result of subsidence and cause the flow of surface hater to the <br /> mine. <br /> Subsequent to completion of mining, the ground water will slowly reestablish <br /> its premining water levels. Due to the caving of the roof materials into the <br /> mine, an area of increased permeability will exist within the mine which will <br /> act as a "sump area" until equilibrium is established. However, due to the <br /> small quantity of water in the aquifers being discharged to the White River <br /> and its tributaries, the lack of ground water usage in the area, and the poor <br /> quality of ground water, potential impacts to flow in the White River will be <br /> very minor. <br /> It could be possible for water to discharge from the portals once the mine <br /> workings have become completely flooded. The portals are up-dip in the mine <br /> and drainage will tend to move down the dip of the mine and coal seam, thereby <br /> increasing the time to flood the workings; however, it is uncertain if the <br /> drainage out of the mine area through the coal seam will exceed the drainage <br /> into the mine from overlying strata. If outflow does not exceed inflow, some <br /> discharge from the portals may occur. The permittee has proposed backfilling <br /> of the portals and construction of concrete bulkheads upon closure of the <br /> mine, minimizing the possibility for discharge of water. <br /> In the northern sections of the mine plan area, a large coal refuse disposal <br /> area is proposed. Drill hole data indicates that there is no ground water <br /> within 44 feet of the ground surface in the disposal area, and recharge to <br /> ground water-An the Mesaverde Group is minimal . Infiltration of water through <br /> the refuse pile will be minimized by covering the compacted refuse with four <br /> feet of the best available nontoxic material . Impacts to the ground water <br /> system are not expected to be significant due to the relatively impermeable <br /> nature of the refuse and the low water table. <br /> The development and reclamation of the cuts and fills in the portal areas <br /> should have no impact on the bedrock aquifer system. Recharge of the aquifers <br /> does not occur in these areas due to surface water control systems, so <br /> possible degradation of the ground water by infiltrating waters is unlikely. <br /> The fill material itself is generally of suitable quality as a topsoil <br /> substitute except for SAP, values which are up to twice as high as defined in <br /> the Wyoming Guidelines for suitability. As water flows through the fill , <br /> • total dissolved solids may increase due to soluable salts; however, this <br /> occurs naturally within the existing ground water region. The fill does not <br /> contain materials which create a toxic leachate. Water which infiltrates the <br /> fill may reach Scullion Gulch. However, due to the small area of disturbance <br /> relative to the entire drainage basin for Scullion Gulch, this will be a very <br /> minor contribution of flow in the creek. <br />