Laserfiche WebLink
-31- <br /> diversion point could be trucked to the site until the ponds were prepared or <br /> replaced (p. II.C-106b). <br /> The operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br /> IX. Probable Hydrologic Consequences and Cumulative Hydrologic Impacts <br /> Assessment - Rules , 2, , and 2. .6 2 c <br /> The projected hydrologic impacts of mining Federal Coal Leases C-23703, <br /> D-047201 , C-0126669, C-8424, and C-8425 have been added to the discussion of <br /> cumulative impacts for all mine related activities. <br /> Impact of the Mining Operation on Surface Water <br /> Impacts to the hydrologic balance will occur as a result of the proposed <br /> mine. Short term impacts which will occur as a result of surface facilities <br /> appurtenant to the underground mine include reduction of water yield from the <br /> mine plan area to the White River, increased sediment loads from disturbed <br /> areas, and water quality degradation from the refuse disposal area. Long term <br /> impacts will center on the effects of subsidence under Scullion Gulch and <br /> Red Wash. See the subsidence section of this findings document for further <br /> discussion of subsidence impacts. <br /> Short term surface water loss will occur as a result of two factors: <br /> retention of water in ponds and removal of water from the White River alluvium <br /> (i.e. - Kenney Reservoir) by the well field. Runoff from disturbed areas will <br /> be routed through sedimentation ponds, thereby reducing the amount of flow to <br /> the White River. Evaporation losses will occur because the ponds will not <br /> discharge run-off until some of the available storage volume is filled. Very <br /> little of the impounded water will re-enter the ground water system due to the <br /> clay liner installed in the pond during construction. Losses form the <br /> D-Portal pond will be insignificant when compared to total run-off from the <br /> Scullion Gulch watershed. The pond is designed to store run-off from 44 acres <br /> while Scullion Gulch has a contributing drainage area of 7,552 acres at its <br /> confluence with the White River. The refuse disposal area ponds receive <br /> run-off from approximately 98 acres, which is a very small portion of the <br /> 2,950 acres—drained by the Red Wash tributary through the northern sector of <br /> the permit area. Based on this information, the net loss of surface water <br /> quantity to Red Wash and the White River will be negligible. <br /> The water supply for the mine will come from the White River alluvial well <br /> field at a withdrawal rate of 1 .34 cubic feet per second. This translates to <br /> 0.2 percent of the average annual flow in the river of 672 cfs. Even during <br /> low flow conditions, when the average flow is 245 cfs, the withdrawal rate <br /> will only be 0.55 percent of the available flow. Therefore, adverse impacts <br /> on flow in the White River as a result of proposed withdrawal should be <br /> minimal . Furthermore, the permittee has secured water rights downstream of <br /> the mine that may be used if necessary to replace a depleted water source. <br /> Construction of surface facilities in the permit area will cause temporary <br /> increases in the amount of suspended solids in the surface water system. <br /> Furthermore, concentration of chemicals associated with increased sediment <br /> load, such as iron and manganese, will also increase. At the Deserado Mine, <br /> mitigation of sediment loadiwill be accomplished primarily by sedimentation <br /> ponds. Although sediment increases will occur in the early phases of <br /> i <br />