My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-06-13_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
1986-06-13_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2020 6:58:41 AM
Creation date
6/5/2008 3:23:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/13/1986
Doc Name
Permit Application Approval Package Fed Leases C-023703, D-047201, C-8424, C-8425, C-0126669
From
OSM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-23- <br /> Based on the extensiveness of unconsolidated alluvium along Red Wash and the <br /> probable existence of water with the stream alluvium, the area qualifies for <br /> further consideration as a potential alluvial valley floor. <br /> Water Availability Criteria - Artificial Flood Irrigation <br /> The permittee estimated the potential average annual water yield from the Red <br /> Wash drainage basin using Grunsky's Formula (Grunsky 1908, Sellars, 1965; see <br /> bibliography in permit application). The estimate indicates that an average <br /> of 2,090 acre feet of water could be made available annually in Red Wash. <br /> This corresponds to approximately 0.32 inches of runoff, which is about 3.5 <br /> percent of the annual precipitation falling on the area. <br /> Actual measurements of flow on Red Wash have been made using a crest stage <br /> gage station located at the mouth of the basin. With the crest stage gage <br /> approach towards stream monitoring, only peak flows which occur between <br /> monitoring intervals are recorded. Flows which occur at less than the peak <br /> flow during any one monitoring interval will not be recorded. The crest gage <br /> method is therefore useful for recording peak events only; the method has <br /> limited application for determining duration of flow and hence flow volumes <br /> which occur during the monitoring interval . <br /> The results of the crest gage monitoring efforts on Red Wash indicate that <br /> flow is almost entirely in response to snowmelt and storm rainfall events. A <br /> total of six runoff events'lwere recorded during the two year inventory period <br /> conducted by the permittee'. Events which occurred during the fall and summer <br /> months resulted from thunderstorm activity; however, peak flows during the <br /> year were greatest during the spring as a result of snowmelts. The largest <br /> event recorded for Red Wash during the inventory period was 240 cfs, which was <br /> generated as a result of late winter snowmelt. Because of the nature and <br /> intent of crest gage type flow monitoring, it has limited usefulness for <br /> identifying water availability criteria necessary for alluvial valley floor <br /> interpretation. Therefore, the most useful information supplied by the <br /> permittee for AVF purposes is the estimation of average annual streamflow <br /> calculated through Grunskys formula. The amount of water available annually, <br /> as estimate"hreugh his method, indicates that Red Wash further qualifies as <br /> a potential alluvial valley floor. <br /> Subirrigation <br /> At the time of issuance of, the initial permanent regulatory program permit, <br /> the presence of subirrigation along Red Wash had been investigated by the <br /> permittee solely on the basis of vegetation identified along the drainage. <br /> Vegetative species indicative of subirrigated conditions were mapped by the <br /> permittee and are shown on Map of 129 of Volume 11 of the application. The <br /> results indicate that a big sage brush - greasewood community exists along the <br /> majority of the streamlaid deposits identified on Map 102. The permittee <br /> indicated that water in the alluvium is available to the plant species <br /> i identified in the big range brush - greasewood community, as most of the <br /> species are deep rooted and xerophytic. Since no evidence was provided by the <br /> permittee during the original permit review to support the contention that <br /> subirrigation was not occurring, it was concluded that subirrigation is a <br /> distinct possibility alonglithe entire length of unconsolidated streamlaid <br /> deposits identified on Map,i129. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.