Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />where: <br />Sampline Adequacy Determination <br />Sampling was conducted pursuant to the requirements of Rule 4.15.8, and from this information sample means (x), <br />and sample variances (s') were determined for each plant variable for each community. Enough samples were <br />taken to provide a plant variable estimated to within 10 percent of the true mean (m) with 90 percent confidence for <br />herbaceous and 80 percent confidence for woody communities. Sampling to at least these values constituted an <br />adequate sample. <br />To obtain an adequate sample and estimates of each parameter, the following inequality was met: <br />= the actual number of samples taken <br />where: <br />s' =sample variance <br />=value from a t table (1.28 for woody communities or 1.645 for herbaceous ones) <br />LJ <br />nmin ~ n <br />nmin = (t~sZ) <br />(o- 1~ <br />x =sample mean <br />Reference Area Testio¢ Statistics <br />To provide the basis for reclamation success, TCC has opted to use reference areas pursuant to Rule 4.15.7. To <br />prove that chosen reference areas are statistically equivalent to their cortesponding vegetation types with respect to <br />the measured variables, a standard two-tailed t-test of the means with equal variances assumed (Larson 1980) was <br />performed. This test was performed at the alpha = .OS level for differences between means. <br />Because the number of samples taken for each community was not necessarily the same as the number taken for the <br />corresponding reference areas, a weighted tabular t comparison statistic (t,) was calculated as follows: <br />where: <br />4 = (sit/n~i)(tai) + (szr/nz)(~z) <br />(si /ni) + (s~ /nx) <br />Subscript 1 = premine vegetation type parameters <br />Subscript 2 = cortesponding reference area parameters <br />to = tabular t value for ni_ l or <br />n2- I d.f. at the a = .OS level. <br />• <br />Permit Renewal No. 3 <br />2.04-53 <br />12/10/98 <br />