My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2008-02-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:22:05 PM
Creation date
6/5/2008 2:16:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/4/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04 Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Three other major areas of concern have been identified by the regulatory and wildlife agencies: <br />(I) location of mine facilities in relation to big game critical winter range and the potential for <br />increased occurrence of big game road-kills, <br />(2) [he effect of mine development and operation on sage grouse strutting grounds, and <br />(3) the effect of mine development and operation on sandhill crane nesting activity in Twentymile <br />park. <br />Map 19, Elk Biological Features, and Map 20, Mule Deer Biological Features, show the location of the Fish Creek <br />Borehole/Shaft Area and associated access road in relation [o elk and mule deer winter concentration areas and <br />critical winter range. As shown on these maps, no new surface disturbance will occur in elk or mule deer critical <br />winter range. There is, however, a potential for occurrence of elk and mule deer/vehicle or haul truck collisions, <br />especially in areas where the access or haul road are in proximity to winter concentration areas or critical winter <br />range. The potential for elk and mule deer/vehicle collision is discussed in detail above. Possible mi[igatirnt <br />measures to reduce this potential are presented in the response to Rule 2.05.6(2). <br />The locations of proposed surface facilities in relation [o sage grouse strutting grounds and important sage grouse <br />habitat arc shown on Map 22, Locations of Sage Grouse Leks and Sagebrush Habitat. As discussed above, the <br />only disturbance to sagebrush habitat will occur from widening and upgrading the existing roads, and from the <br />construction of a new road which will connect existing roads to be upgraded, over sagebrushimeadow habitat a[ <br />Fish Creek. A total of only 6.8 acres of low sagebrush, 0.4 acres of sagebrush/meadow and 0.6 acres of mountain <br />sagebrush will be disturbed, and the effect on sage grouse populations will be negligible. As discussed previously, <br />no sage grouse critical winter habitat occurs on the permit area. The Hudspeth Complex is not likely to be affected <br />by mine development activities. The closest portions of the access road are at least I mi (I.6 km) away from [he <br />Hudspeth Complex and are out of direct line of sight from the complex by virtue of [he surrounding topography. <br />The Twentymile Lek is located somewhat closer to [he proposed access road and Fish Creek Borehole/Shaft Area. <br />ft is separated f}om the access road by over 0.5 mil (0.8 km) and from [he Fish Creek Borehole/Shaft Area by <br />approximately 0.75 mi (1.2 km). The access road and most of [he Fish Creek Borehole/Shaft area are, however, <br />shielded by topography from direct line of sight of the Twentymile Lek by topography. Early morning shift traffic <br />(7:00 am) on the access road will not coincide with the timing of peak breeding ac[ivih• of sage grouse (one hour <br />before sunrise to one hour after sunrise; Rodgers 1964, Gill 1965, Jenni and Harzler 1978). In addition, the Fish <br />Creek Borehole/Shaft Area will only be a ventilation shaft with limited employee activity once construction is <br />complete. Therefore, mine activities are no[ expected ro affect grouse breeding activity at the Twentymile Lek. <br />Possible mitigative measures [o further limit the potential for disturbance of grouse leks are listed in the response <br />to Rule 2.05.6(2). <br />Map 21, Locations of sandhill Crane Nests and Nesting Habi[a[ and Raptor Cliff-nesting Habitat, shows [he <br />locations of sandhill crane nest sites and potential crane nesting habitat in relation to the proposed surface <br />facilities. sandhill cranes are sensitive to human disturbance, particularly during the nesting and incubation period <br />(May through June 30). Enriquez (1979) considered lack of human disturbance a key limiting factor in sandhill <br />crane use of suitable nesting habitat. However, cranes foraging in Twentymile Park appear to adapt to human <br />activity rather rapidly (Grant 1983). Blake (1974) recommended that permanent major developments and roads <br />should be at leas[ 0.25 and 0.125 mi (0.4 and 0.2 km), respectively from crane nesting areas. To insure that nest <br />sites will continue to be suitable for use by nesting cranes, any major developments are planned to be located at <br />leas[ 0.25 mi (0.4 km) away from nest sites. In addition, all access roads are planned to be located at least 0.125 <br />miles (0? Km) from potentially suitable nesting habitat. Possible methods to limit disturbance to sandhill crane <br />nesting habitat are listed in the response to Rule 2.05.6(2). <br /> <br />MR 97-154 2.04-79 Revised 10/02/97 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.