Laserfiche WebLink
Colorado are laid from late May to early June. The incubation period for cranes is approximately 30 days <br />• (Drewien 1973, Blake 1974). Drewien (1973) found that cranes seldom left nests unattended once eggs were laid, <br />tnd during B7 hours of observ'mg 5 incubating pairs, he found that nests were unattended only I? percent of the <br />time. Incubation duties are shared by both birds with the female usually incubating at night and the male during <br />the day (Blake 1974). <br />There was some evidence that the unusually late spring and extremely high runoff in mid-May may have disrupted <br />or delayed crane nesting activity in Twentymile Park. In Blake's (1975) studies on nesting cranes in northwest <br />Colorado, nesting was delayed about two weeks as a result of late, heavy snowstorms. Unusually late spring <br />snowstorms and heavy spring runoff were documented for the general Twentymile Park region in 1984. Runoff in <br />mid-May in Twentymile Park was so high that Fish Creek overflowed its banks and washed out a portion of <br />County Road No. 27 near the southern edge of the permit area. Many of the smaller drainages in the permit area <br />also showed evidence of high water, as indicated by debris piled up in the sagebrush above the drainages. High <br />water in mid-May may explain why the nest located in early May by John Monarch could not be relocated in June. <br />In a study of nesting cranes in Oregon, Littlefield (1968) documented one case of nest desertion as a result of <br />Flooding. It is uncertain whether renesting would occur after desertion due to Flooding, but renesting following egg <br />destruction by predators has been documented (Littlefield 1968, Drewien 1973). <br />Three additional active nests were located in the permit area by CDOW personnel during a helicopter survey of the <br />~,eneral area in late June, 1984. Two nests contained two eggs and one was vacant. Locations of these nests are <br />also plotted on Map 21, Locations of Sandhill Crane Nests and Nesting Habitat and Raptor Cliff-nesting Habitat. <br />Unless notified by regulatory authorities, no further surveys are planned. <br />Elk and Mule Deer Critical Winter Ranee versus Proposed Surface Disturbance <br />• As discussed previously, mule deer winter habitat in the permit area is limited to the southeast portion. Critical <br />winter range and concentration areas occur along the southwest and southeast facing, shrub-covered slopes near <br />Foidel Creek (Map 20, Mule Deer Biological Features). No mule deer migration routes have been identified in the <br />area. As shown on Map 20, Mule Deer Biological Features, no new surface disturbances are proposed to occur <br />within any mule deer critical winter range or concentration areas. An existing road at the eastern end of designated <br />mule deer winter range will be upgraded to provide access [o the Fish Creek shafts. This road will have no <br />impacts on the critical winter range. Other existing roads (County Roads No. 27 and No. 33) which will be used <br />for coal haulage, pass between the two slopes designated as critical mule deer winter range. <br />Glk winter range encompasses the entire permit area with critical winter range occurring along the northwestern <br />boundary of the permit area and on southern facing slopes in the southeastern portion of the permit area (Map 19, <br />Elk Biological Features). CDOW Wildlife information System Maps incorrectly show elk critical range (along the <br />northeast boundary of the permit area) extending from the southeast-facing, shrub-covered slopes into gently <br />rolling cropland. The correct eastern boundary of this critical winter range should generally coincide with [he toe <br />of the southeast-facing shrub-covered slopes, since the cropland portions of the permit area are completely covered <br />by snow in the winter, and cropland is not a preferred critical winter habitat for elk. Winter aerial elk surveys <br />performed by the Applicant's biologists indicate that there is little, if any, mid to late winter elk use of habitats <br />occurring east of the foothills along the western edge of the permit area. The CDOW mapping and corrected <br />boundary are both plotted on Map 19, Elk Biological Features. As shown on Map 19, Elk Biological Features, no <br />new' surface disturbances will occur within actual elk critical winter range. The southern access route to the Fish <br />Creek Borehole/Shaft Area will run (for approximately I mi or 1.6 km) along the eastern edge of a designated elk <br />concentration area and also cross an elk migration route. In addition, the coal haulage roads (County Roads No. 27 <br />. and No. 33) cross approximately 0.75 mi (1.2 km) of an elk winter concentration area, and the Fish Creek <br />Borehole/Shaft Area extends inro a small portion of elk winter concentration area. <br />MR 97-154 2.04-75 Revised 10/(12/97 <br />