My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-13_PERMIT FILE - C1992081 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1992081
>
2008-03-13_PERMIT FILE - C1992081 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:24:58 PM
Creation date
6/4/2008 5:02:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/13/2008
Doc Name
REGIONAL HYDROGEOLOGY
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 07 ATTACHMENT 7-1, Attachment 7-2, Attachment 7-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.0 ANALYSIS AND CONCL~ISIONS <br />• <br />4.1 Sources of :Flow <br />The similarity between stream quality <br />quality for samples collected dui-ing <br />Diagram) indicates that Dry and Sage, <br />Dowden Gulches are fed from seepage f <br />Another strong indication o~ this is <br />the streams above the Twentymile sand <br />crop in the Hayden Gulch and Dowden G <br />and the ground iYater <br />the study (see the Stiff <br />Creeks and Hayden add <br />rom the aquifers: <br />the absence of €low in <br />stone aquifers dut= <br />uleh drainages: <br />Figure 8 shows the drainages of the gages in relation to the <br />study area geology: All of the drainages are in either the <br />Lewis Shale, .the Williams Fork Formation or the Iles Formation. <br />Only the lower stations on Sage and Dry Creeks inelude mtieh of the <br />the Lewis Shale in their drainage. The increase ih dissolved <br />solids in these streams is caused by seepage from the Lewis <br />Shale. Seepage from shales is typically very high in dissolved <br />solids, particularly in sodium and sulfate; as was the case in <br />samples from these streams: Shall seepage also contributed <br />to the increased concentrations of iron and manganese, prbb- • <br />ably because of ion exchange reactions between the water and <br />clay in the shale. <br />4.2 Mining-Related Ef.feC.ts.ori Water Rg~b:ur.ces <br />Mining-related effects dri surface water will be negligible <br />because the mine is hear a drainage divide; acid therefore little <br />water flows through the proposed mine area besides that from <br />snow or rain falling on the site: Fldw iii Hayden and Dowden <br />gulches will also remain unaffected, since the Twentymile <br />Sandstone aquifer will not be altered: The upper portions of <br />Sage Creek should not 6e affected; since it does hot inelude <br />either .the mine or the corridor. <br />Upper Dry Creek is expected to show ari increase in suspended <br />solids during the construction of the haulage. road; but norm<<lly <br />there should be no other measurable change: The quality of <br />the lower portions of Sage and Dry Creeks is affected by seei~- <br />age from the Lewis Shale to the extent thaf fhe xater is un- <br />suitable for domestic use and is a questionable, source of <br />irrigation water during most of the time that the .streams do <br />flow. <br />\. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.