Laserfiche WebLink
the two areas 'bn "the wa~teY•' and .to "show e'c~rAdit~~bi1'B` ~eb'oVe <br />• and below 'the (nine. <br />The approxifllate a~•eas of the drain ages.ab~vb~the ghge's aYe <br />shown on Table 1, CAa~Rel cross sections at the "c*rest stage <br />gages are. shown on ~iguY•es 3 through 5. ~Vatex rights fisted <br />with the State eftgineeY's Office for the Four dYaina.ges afe <br />shown on ~fgure b and 1g3t'0d er1 Table 2, <br />2.2. Streamflow <br />~gince VTN'3 i4bYlC i~nciuded brily tree fnohths of moAito"rings ,a <br />complete 3~a3anal tytie.could ript be bbseYvedi homeCrers other <br />reports wePe available for needed additional infoFiaatibn:• <br />According to the Nof ttYwest Colorado ~Aal ~fS (voli~~9e ~.) s41d <br />other doFumeats, all fauF §tYeams~aYe ephemeYai•. Hayden and <br />Dowden gulfhea probably flaw foY• the shof•test tiles froYA fouY~ <br />to six v~e+eks during 3pYia~g showi~eit: ~i'h~e larger drainage area <br />and great2T u3'e of the taateY (especiaiiy far st'bfa'ge in =eser- <br />voirs) iftdize.te-that.~Yy_altd Sage creeks flaw faY a longer <br />period of tine; perhaps faY forif months HY store each year. <br />Estimates of the mega atthual fldw at the gauge site§ aid <br />shown on i'able 3, Eompared with the flaws ti1e3§itYBd at tie <br />time water quality samples were taken, these WaiHes ate <br />pYaba6ly comet+hat high, (The Yusuits of watersample analysi§ <br />ara shotrn on Table $ . ) , <br />Ail fauf dPaifiages may fldw•bt`iefly dilYing thaiY haYmaiiy_diy <br />ppPi0d3 as a Penult df PUhbff fYafrl heal+y_thl'sHdePsti3~~s: l'hese <br />p~xak fioore aPe muEh higheP than aveYage fiotvs: E§tima~~3 0~ <br />peek fioM$ foP VaPious PeEIlPreftEe iilterifals aY'c §hawH flit' <br />Table 4~~ - <br /> <br />