Laserfiche WebLink
TAB 7 <br />HYDROLOGICAL DESCRIPTION <br />Regional Hydrogeology and Surface water Characteristics <br />Hayden Gulch Terminal, Inc.'s (HGTI) Loadout facility is situated principally (coal <br />handling facility area and majority of the railroad spur) in the Dry Creek drainage basin <br />(tributary to the Yampa River). A small portion of the railroad spur exists in the Yampa <br />River drainage basin. A regional hydrological description of this area is presented in <br />detail in Attachment 7-1, Regional Hydrology. <br />Site Specific Ground Water Characteristics <br />The coal handling facility area of the Hayden Gulch Loadout is situated in alluvial and <br />colluvial materials overlying the Lewis shale of upper Cretaceous age. Two <br />alluvial/shallow Lewis shale wells were constructed in the Loadout area prior to 1993 by <br />the pervious operator, H-G Coal Company. One well, identified as HGDALI, is located <br />upgradient of the Loadout area and the second well, identified as HGDAL2, is located <br />downgradient of the Loadout. During October 1993, a new downgradient alluvial well, <br />identified as HGDAL3, was constructed along Dry Creek within the Rail Loop to assure all <br />potential groundwater impacts from the Loadout could be assessed. This downgradient well <br />was installed to alleviate CDMG concerns regarding the possibility that wells HGDALI and <br />HGDAL2 were partially completed in the Lewis shale (a typical completion diagram that is <br />representative of both HGDALI and HGDAL2 is presented in Tab 13 as Figure 13-2). <br />Completion information for monitor well HGDAL3 is presented in Attachment 7-2, Completion <br />and Aquifer Test Data Well HGDAL3. In November 2005, a new upgradient alluvial monitor <br />well, identified as HGDAL4, was constructed along Dry Creek immediately upgradient of the <br />facility area. The well was installed to address CDMG concerns that there was <br />insufficient background alluvial water quality data against which downgradient alluvial <br />water quality data could be compared. Completion information for monitor well HGDAL4 is <br />presented in Attachment 7-4, Well HGDAL4 Well Information. The locations of the four <br />alluvial monitor wells are shown on Exhibit 12-2, Surface Water Control Plan, in Tab 12 <br />and Figure 13-1, Monitoring Site Location Map, in Tab 13. <br />Seasonal Variability and Trends. Tables 7-1, 7-2, and 7-3 present the water level and <br />chemistry data (through 1995) for wells HGDALI, HGDAL2, and HGDAL3, respectively (recent <br />data, including data for well HGDAL4 are presented in the Annual Hydrology Reports, which <br />are submitted to CDMG under separate cover). Water level ranged from 1.6 to 8.4 feet <br />below ground surface (bgs), 0.7 to 13.5 feet bgs, and 0.9 to 7.5 feet bgs at wells HGDALI, <br />HGDAL2 and HGDAL3, respectively. On 5/4/95, the water level in well HGDALI was reported <br />as -0.42 feet, which indicates that the water level in the casing was above ground <br />surface. Generally, no water level trends or seasonality are evident at the wells, <br />however, water levels tend to be higher during spring snowmelt months which indicates that <br />snowmelt may be recharging the alluvium. <br />MR-16 1 Revised 11/07 <br />