My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-01-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1983052
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1983052
>
2005-01-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1983052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 11:50:57 AM
Creation date
6/4/2008 11:17:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983052
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/27/2005
Doc Name
Complaint in civil action #04-F-2196 (OES)
From
Terry Hankins
To
Gale Norton
Email Name
CBM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Answer, P.2(con't) <br />2. Many other mining claimants are being similarly <br />accosted, intimidated, and threatened by BLM or Forest Service <br />personnell throughout the westernDnited States and in Alaska, <br />in a well-established, thoroughly organized, and documented <br />pattern of intentional constitutional tort against mining <br />claimants on public lands. My Amended Complaint, attached <br />destruction <br />hereto, addresses the matter of the physical/of the Joker MIll <br />by the BLM in 2002-2004, which established a pattern of prior <br />misconduct and abuses of Federal power by Rob Ernst and others. <br />This continued pattern of constitutional tort establishes both <br />a criminal and civil matter of abuse that the Court is most <br />certainly empowered, and in fact, required to address and prevent. <br />The criminal aspects are left up to the Attorney General to act <br />or not act on my written letter of Complaint dated Nov 27,2004, <br />which is attached to provide further information on the Joker <br />Mill destruction,2002-2004. This court action is intended to <br />address only the civil aspects of the case. The Defendant states <br />in her Motion for Dismissal that there is no active case that <br />involNfs the subject matter, but perhaps now there is or should <br />be. Most small mine operators do not have the resources nor the <br />will to stand up to the overwhelming power of the Federal gov- <br />ernment. I probably won't be able to persevere and maintain the <br />will to speak up about the well-known abuses, since I have other <br />work that I need to do, besides involvment in a lawsuit, but I <br />feel someone must speak up and take the initiative to preserve <br />a few of the rights that originally made this country great and <br />which seem to get more shop-worn every year. I hope that the <br />Court is inclined to feel the same way.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.