My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-04_PERMIT FILE - C1981038A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981038A
>
2008-04-04_PERMIT FILE - C1981038A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:26:58 PM
Creation date
6/4/2008 11:12:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/4/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Environmental Resources - Fish & Wildlife Appendix Part 3
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 6 <br />reported that water temperatures in the Colorado River were suitable for <br />spawning in the Grand Junction area. In 1986, a year of high runoff, suitable <br />temperatures for spawning (20 °C) occurred in the first week of August. In <br />1989, a year of low runoff, the mean temperature reached 20 °C during the last <br />week of June. Miller et al. (1982) and Archer et al. (1986) demonstrated that <br />Colorado squawfish often migrate considerable distances to spawn in the Green <br />and Yampa Rivers, and similar movement has been noted in the main stem <br />Colorado River. <br />Miller et al. (1982) concluded from collections of larvae and young-of-year <br />below known spawning sites that there is a downstream drift of larval Colorado <br />squawfish following hatching. Extensive studies in the Yampa and upper Green <br />Rivers have demonstrated downstream distribution of young Colorado squawfish <br />from known spawning areas (Archer et al. 1986; Haynes et al. 1985). Miller <br />et al. (1982) also found that young-of-year Colorado squawfish, from late <br />summer through fall, preferred natural backwater areas of zero velocity and <br />less than 1.5-foot depth over a silt substrate. Juvenile Colorado squawfish <br />habitat preferences are similar to that of young-of-year fish, but they appear <br />to be mobile and more tolerant of lotic conditions away from the sheltered <br />backwater environment. <br />Information on radio-tagged adult Colorado squawfish during fall suggests that <br />fish seek out deepwater areas in the Colorado River (Miller et al. 1982), as <br />do many other riverine species. River pools, runs, and other deep water <br />areas, especially in upstream reaches, are important winter habitats for <br />Colorado squawfish. <br />Very little information is available on the influence of turbidity on the <br />endangered Colorado River fishes. It is assumed, however, that turbidity is <br />important, particularly as it affects the interaction between introduced <br />fishes and the endemic Colorado River fishes. Because these endemic fishes <br />have evolved under natural conditions of high turbidity, it is concluded that <br />the retention of these highly turbid conditions is an important factor for <br />these endangered fishes. Reduction of turbidity may enable introduced species <br />to gain a competitive edge which could further contribute to the decline of <br />the endangered Colorado River fishes. <br />Migration <br />Radio-telemetry studies show upstream and downstream movement of adult <br />Colorado squawfish in the main stem Colorado River. The most dramatic <br />movement was exhibited by a fish implanted with a radio transmitter at Gypsum <br />Canyon in upper Lake Powell on April 5, 1982. The fish was contacted next in <br />the lower Cataract Canyon area on July 9, ]982. The next contact was made <br />above the Black Rocks area of Ruby Canyon, some 160 miles upstream. The <br />movement was accomplished in 41 days and is believed to be related to <br />spawning. At the end of September 1982, this fish was located in the Colorado <br />River in the vicinity of Clifton, Colorado (river mile 178), nearly 200 river <br />miles from its furthest documented downstream location. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.