My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (289)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (289)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2021 7:34:31 AM
Creation date
6/3/2008 12:41:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
12/1/1987
Doc Name
Geotechnical Investigations Mine Portal Benches and Haul Roads
Section_Exhibit Name
Chapter V Appendix V-E-II
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
there are no important ground water aquifers discharging into <br /> the basin. <br /> Morphological features of the area have been very much <br /> influenced by the harsh climate related to the exceptionally <br /> high altitude. Erosional processes significantly contributed to <br /> the rugged topography. Frequent avalanches continuously modify <br /> the surface features at numerous locations along the haul roads <br /> and at several mine benches. <br /> 2. 2 HAUL ROADS <br /> Development of the haul road system in the Coal Basin was <br /> a difficult task. Rugged mountainous topography, steep slopes, <br /> severe erosion problems, potentially unstable slopes, and the <br /> high avalanche danger comprise a set of exceptionally unfavor— <br /> able factors for road construction. Operational requirements of <br /> a road width of 50 to 60 feet comprise an additional factor <br /> that increases the difficulty of the construction. <br /> As is common in road construction in similar conditions, <br /> the roads were mostly constructed in cuts using the sidecast <br /> method. Fills were used mostly only as means of disposing of <br /> material from the cut; they were not compacted or constructed <br /> as structural fills. There is no evidence that the vegetation <br /> or topsoil were removed from the areas of the dumped fill. <br /> Fills built in such a manner are rarely capable of <br /> supporting the roadway; they are usually subject to important <br /> settlement, sloughing and erosion. Their slopes are steep, <br /> close to the angle of repose. Their thickness is usually very <br /> limited ("sliver fills") ; it depends on the topographic <br /> conditions of the fill foundation. If the natural ground is <br /> steep, the loosely dumped fill covers large areas below the <br /> road as the material rolls down to a considerable distance <br /> below the road. On flatter slopes , the thickness of the fill <br /> may increase ; in such cases, the fill surface may be used for <br /> part of the roadway. Settlements of the fill that inevitably <br /> occur after the road construction can be rectified during the <br /> lifetime of the road by placing additional material on the fill <br /> surface. <br /> Fills designed to carry parts or all the roadway were used <br /> only exceptionally at locations where there was no road cut <br /> (such as crossing drainages) , in sections where the cut <br /> excavation was not feasible for operational reasons , or in <br /> cases where the height of the cut was not acceptable for <br /> stability reasons . <br /> 6 <br /> GEO-HYDRO CONSULTING,INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.