My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (284)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (284)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2021 6:55:45 AM
Creation date
6/2/2008 12:43:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
12/1/1987
Doc Name
Subsidence Study By Dr. Bruce Collins
Section_Exhibit Name
Chapter IV Appendix IV-F-4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 - 1� <br /> l <br /> Formation member of the Mesaverde Group; the A-B coal zone, <br /> the lowest mined in Coal Basin, essentially forms the base <br /> of the Williams Fork. As has been discussed above, no <br /> aquifers are thought to be present in this interval . With <br /> two exceptions the sandstones present are lenticular stream <br /> channel sands with limited individual bed lateral extent. <br /> All of the sandstones are fairly tightly cemented and <br /> commonly contain a clay matrix, further reducing ground- <br /> water carrying capabilities. It should be noted that the <br /> Mesaverde sandstones of this interval have been the target <br /> of several "tight sand" natural gas stimulation tests in <br /> the southern Piceance Creek basin in the last 15 years; none <br /> of these tests have been spectacularly successful . In any <br /> case, these sandstones outcrop or subcrop on the steep slopes <br /> of the interior of Coal Basin. The steep slopes and cliffs <br /> limit surface exposure to recharge, and recharge to any <br /> potential aquifer is further reduced because the entire <br /> sequence from the Rollins up is well-drained by Coal Creek <br /> and its tributaries (the Rollins is everywhere above the <br /> "floor" of the basin) , and the large amount of siltstone, mud- <br /> stone and claystone in the sequence effectively seals the <br /> sandstones from above. Therefore no damage to or diminuation <br /> of the regional hydrologic system is anticipated. <br /> Geologic conditions, i.e. general stratigraphy and structure, <br /> in remaining unmined areas are essentially identical to those <br /> • areas worked over the last 30 years . There is therefore no <br /> reason to expect that future manifestations of subsidence or <br /> subsidence-related phenomena will be any different than as <br /> have been observed and measured to date. The only apparently <br /> significant variable will be the actual aggregate thickness <br /> of coal removed. <br /> 5 . Determination statement of the effects of subsidence , if <br /> it did occur, on material damage or diminuation of reasonably <br /> foreseeable use of structures or renewable resource lands. <br /> Subsidence of the land surface over mined-out areas of the <br /> Coal Basin mines has been detected by the subsidence monitoring <br /> program initiated by MCR in 1981 . Maximum subsidence detected <br /> to date is 2 .10 feet, at a point now apparently stable (MC-4) . <br /> This amount of subsidence resulted from the extraction of at <br /> least 8 feet of coal, and possibly as much as 16 feet (see <br /> discussion in paragraph 3 above) . There are no visible sur- <br /> face effects of subsidence, such as cracks, hummocked profiles <br /> or subsidence-induced slumps or landslides in the large portion <br /> of the area inspected for such features. There has been no <br /> subsidence damage to the few structures, primarily mine ventil- <br /> ation fans, or to power lines or light-use roads located over <br /> mined-out areas. There are no known aquifers above the coal <br /> beds being mined in the area, and renewable resource lands are <br /> restricted to small livestock and wildlife summer grazing areas. <br /> Neither MCR, White River National Forest (letter of 10/14/80) <br /> nor Gunnison National Forest (letter of 9/1/80) plan on any <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.