My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (284)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (284)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2021 6:55:45 AM
Creation date
6/2/2008 12:43:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
12/1/1987
Doc Name
Subsidence Study By Dr. Bruce Collins
Section_Exhibit Name
Chapter IV Appendix IV-F-4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-,, - 6 - <br /> 301 , L.S. Wood No.' 3 mine. Point TP-4 , which has subsided <br /> • but is nearly stable (-0 . 06 feet of movement between Sep- <br /> tember of 1984 and'„ August of 1985) , is located directly <br /> ahead (north) of the longwall 301 tailgate; mining ceased <br /> in early 1981. TP-2 , which has not subsided, is located <br /> northwest of the headgate of the abandoned 301 face, and <br /> MC-8 , which also has not subsided, is southwest of the <br /> headgate entries 350 feet back from the face (exact loca- <br /> tions are given below) . Using the same methods as above, <br /> except that the elevation of the intersection of H with <br /> the surface was taken from topographic maps, for TP-4 H is <br /> `2 ,265 feet, angle 0 is 36 . 33 , and x is 340 feet, giving <br /> an apparent angle of draw of 13 . 02 . For TP-2 , H is also <br /> (by coincidence) 2 ,265 feet, 0 is 30 .450 and x equals 820 <br /> feet, for an apparent angle of draw of 25 . 97 . Finally, <br /> for MC-8 , H is 2 ,530 feet, 0 equals 25 .57 , and x is 790 <br /> feet, for an apparent angle of draw of 20.99° From this <br /> data 0it is cle$r that the actual angle of draw is between <br /> 13 . 0 and 21 . 0 . <br /> In summary, adjacent to an active mining area, the angle of <br /> draw appears to be approximately 16 .5 , in an area of tight <br /> control . Adjacent to an area that has not been worked for <br /> over 5 years and that now appears to be almost stable, where <br /> data points are admittedly less concentrated, the angle of <br /> draw is between 130 and 21° Given this information, it <br /> would appear that the angle of draw stipulated by CMLRD is <br /> too conservative . The actual angle of draw is probably in <br /> the vicinity of 18° Using this angle, measurable subsidence <br /> should be expected from 400 to 815 feet from the edge of <br /> mined-out areas, assuming slopes angles from 0 to 450 and <br /> an average depth of cover of 2 ,500 feet. <br /> In conclusion, based on actual subsidence monitoring data <br /> obtained since the baseline survey in 1981, the maximum verti- <br /> cal subsidence above the Coal Basin underground workings <br /> should not exceed 7 .2 feet. These data also indicate that <br /> the actual angle of draw is approximately 18 , which could <br /> result in measureable subsidence effects from 400 to 815 <br /> feet horizontally from the edge of mined-out areas. <br /> 4 . Description of damage or diminuation of reasonably fore- <br /> seeable use of structures and renewable resource lands which <br /> could result from subsidence. The only structures currently <br /> located above mined-out areas consist of mine ventilation <br /> fans and associated facilities, such as access roads and <br /> power lines. All of these facilities are located above areas <br /> mined out years ago (in most cases over 20 years) and assumed <br /> to be stable. Most of these structures have been in place <br /> for a number of years and no subsidence damage has been noted. <br /> Other man-made features are limited to light-duty roads on the <br /> surface, and the M bed mine workings over mined-out areas in <br /> �t <br /> the B bed. Given the apparent plastic yield of near-surface <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.